Cited by 10Anatomy and Medical TechnologyUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and ResearchInnovations in Medical Education

Nursing students' experiences and perceptions of an anatomy laboratory session: Mixed methods study

Asman, Oren, Kagan, Ilya, Itzhaki, Michal·2022·Anatomical Sciences Education

Abstract

Many nursing curricula do not offer anatomy laboratories and exposure to cadaveric material. In this mixed methods study, nursing students' perceptions and experiences from an anatomy laboratory session were examined. Students from two academic nursing programs (a four‐year general baccalaureate nursing program and a two‐year accelerated nursing program for non‐nursing baccalaureate graduates) took part in an anatomy laboratory session (N = 223). Participants' learning experiences, emotional experiences, and satisfaction with the anatomy laboratory session were assessed by their responses to closed‐ended questionnaires. Participants' reasons for participation and suggestions for improvement were examined by open‐ended questions. A mixed methods analysis of the data revealed a high level of satisfaction with the anatomy laboratory experience. Positive attitudes and learning experiences correlated with a sense of identification with the nursing profession. Satisfaction was positively associated with a perceived quality of learning and negatively associated with a negative emotional experience. Curiosity and self‐challenge, as well as the quest for tangible, in‐depth learning, were major motivators involved in the students' desire to participate in the session. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses indicated that the educational experience was significant. Therefore, it is recommended to integrate anatomy laboratory sessions into anatomy courses for nursing students. This will help to illustrate and assimilate classroom material and strengthen nursing students' sense of identification with their profession.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ase.2106

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asman, O., Kagan, I., & Itzhaki, M.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Asman, Oren
Venue
Anatomical Sciences Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-12-02
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
898-909
ISSN
  • 1935-9772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-9780
OpenAlex
W3160172807
Cited by
10
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anatomical Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
nursing students, anatomy laboratory, cadaveric dissection, student perceptions, student satisfaction, emotional experience, learning experience, accelerated nursing programs, baccalaureate nursing education, professional identity, student motivation
MeSH terms
Anatomy, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Humans, Laboratories, Learning, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review