Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Team‐based learning in anatomy: An efficient, effective, and economical strategy

Vasan, Nagaswami S., DeFouw, David O., Compton, Scott·2011·Anatomical Sciences Education

Abstract

Team‐based learning (TBL) strategy is being adopted in medical education to implement interactive small group learning. We have modified classical TBL to fit our curricular needs and approach. Anatomy lectures were replaced with TBL that required preparation of assigned content specific discussion topics (in the text referred as “discussion topics”), an individual self‐assessment quiz (IRAT), analysis of the discussion topics, and then the team retaking the same quiz (GRAT) for discussion and deeper learning. Embryology and clinical correlations were given as lectures. Unit examinations consisted of graded IRAT and GRAT. The National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Subject Examination was the comprehensive final examination. To evaluate the effect of TBL on student performance we compared the departmental and NBME subject examination scores between the traditional and TBL curricula. We collected five years of data on student performance in TBL‐based anatomy and lecture‐based preclinical courses. Our results show that departmental and NBME subject examination scores for TBL‐based anatomy were higher than those for lecture‐based anatomy. We subsequently compared average NBME scores for anatomy with those in other preclinical courses that were lecture‐based. Average NBME anatomy scores were significantly higher than those for all the lecture‐based preclinical courses. Since the introduction of TBL in anatomy, student performance has progressively improved in the NBME subject examination. Students perceived TBL as a motivator to be a responsible team member and to contribute to collective learning by the team. Further, it reinforced self‐directed learning and fostered an appreciation for peer respect. Interestingly, these perceptions were uniform irrespective of student course performance. Anat Sci Educ. © 2011 American Association of Anatomists.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ase.257

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Vasan, N. S., DeFouw, D. O., & Compton, S.
Venue
Anatomical Sciences Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-13
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
333-339
ISSN
  • 1935-9772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-9780
OpenAlex
W2024116984
Cited by
172
References
0
FWCI
59.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Team‐based learning in anatomy: An efficient, effective, and economical strategy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ase.257
The paper
Vasan, N. S., DeFouw, D. O., & Compton, S. (2011). Team‐based learning in anatomy: An efficient, effective, and economical strategy. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.257

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.