Cited by 9Student Assessment and FeedbackScience Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching Methods

Diversifying laboratory assessment modes broadens engagement with practical competencies in life science students

Open access
Drumm, Bernard T., Bree, Ronan, Griffin, Caoimhin S., O’Leary, Niall·2024·Advances in Physiology Education

Abstract

This study suggests that undergraduate life science students can benefit significantly from a holistic assessment strategy that complements reports with performance-based approaches that incorporate broader competencies and allow for greater student engagement and expression in undergraduate modules.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/advan.00257.2023

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drumm, B. T., Bree, R., Griffin, C. S., & O’Leary, N.
Affiliations
  • Dundalk Institute of Technology (IE)
  • Department of Life and Health Science, Dundalk Institute of Technology, Dundalk, Louth, Ireland
  • University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
Drumm, Bernard T.
Venue
Advances in Physiology Education
Published
2024-09-01
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
527-546
ISSN
  • 1043-4046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1229
OpenAlex
W4396774121
Cited by
8
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4
FWCI
11.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AJP Advances in Physiology Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
laboratory evaluation, performance-based assessment, practical competencies, student engagement, life sciences education, undergraduate laboratory teaching, assessment methods, holistic assessment
MeSH terms
Biological Science Disciplines, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Laboratories, Male, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review