The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature
Abstract
This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization. A specialty is conceptualized and visualized as a time‐variant duality between two fundamental concepts in information science: research fronts and intellectual bases. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The intellectual base of a research front is its citation and co‐citation footprint in scientific literature—an evolving network of scientific publications cited by research‐front concepts. Kleinberg's (2002) burst‐detection algorithm is adapted to identify emergent research‐front concepts. Freeman's (1979) betweenness centrality metric is used to highlight potential pivotal points of paradigm shift over time. Two complementary visualization views are designed and implemented: cluster views and time‐zone views. The contributions of the approach are that (a) the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research‐front terms, (b) the value of a co‐citation cluster is explicitly interpreted in terms of research‐front concepts, and (c) visually prominent and algorithmically detected pivotal points substantially reduce the complexity of a visualized network. The modeling and visualization process is implemented in CiteSpace II, a Java application, and applied to the analysis of two research fields: mass extinction (1981–2004) and terrorism (1990–2003). Prominent trends and pivotal points in visualized networks were verified in collaboration with domain experts, who are the authors of pivotal‐point articles. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization
Chen, C. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307513100 · Cited by 2,791
Self-citationWignall, P. B., & Hallam, A. (1992) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/0031-0182(92)90182-5 · Cited by 466
Cited by
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 · Cited by 16,064
Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114562629 · Cited by 7,495
Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Chen, C. (2017) · Journal of Data and Information Science · doi:10.1515/jdis-2017-0006 · Cited by 1,925
Self-citationA review of definitions and measures of system resilience
Hosseini, S., Barker, K., & Ramirez-Marquez, J. E. (2016) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006 · Cited by 1,892
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12-14
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 359-377
- ISSN
- 1532-2882 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2890
- OpenAlex
- W4238591974
- Cited by
- 6,433
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/asi.20317
- The paper
- Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.