CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7,495scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsWeb visibility and informetrics

Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization

Zupic, Ivan, Čater, Tomaž·2015·Organizational Research Methods
DOI 10.1177/1094428114562629
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We aim to develop a meaningful single-source reference for management and organization scholars interested in using bibliometric methods for mapping research specialties. Such methods introduce a measure of objectivity into the evaluation of scientific literature and hold the potential to increase rigor and mitigate researcher bias in reviews of scientific literature by aggregating the opinions of multiple scholars working in the field. We introduce the bibliometric methods of citation analysis, co-citation analysis, bibliographical coupling, co-author analysis, and co-word analysis and present a workflow for conducting bibliometric studies with guidelines for researchers. We envision that bibliometric methods will complement meta-analysis and qualitative structured literature reviews as a method for reviewing and evaluating scientific literature. To demonstrate bibliometric methods, we performed a citation and co-citation analysis to map the intellectual structure of the Organizational Research Methods journal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1094428114562629

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 133

  1. [1]1. Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies , 43 (5), 957-983. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x · DOI
  2. [2]2. Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). The resource-based theory: dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal , 27 (7), 621-636. doi:10.1002/smj.532 · DOI
  3. [3]3. Acedo, F. J., & Casillas, J. C. (2005). Current paradigms in the international management field: An author co-citation analysis. International Business Review , 14 (5), 619-639. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.05.003 · DOI
  4. [4]4. Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., Bosco, F. A., Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Debunking Myths and Urban Legends About Meta-Analysis. Organizational Research Methods , 14 (2), 306-331. doi:10.1177/1094428110375720 · DOI
  5. [5]5. Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., Bosco, F. A., & Muslin, I. S. (2009). First Decade of Organizational Research Methods: Trends in Design, Measurement, and Data-Analysis Topics. Organizational Research Methods , 12 (1), 69-112. doi:10.1177/1094428108322641 · DOI
  6. [6]6. Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 54 (6), 550-560. doi:10.1002/asi.10242 · DOI
  7. [7]7. Artto, K., Martinsuo, M., Gemuendne, H. G., & Murtoaro, J. (2009). Foundations of program management: A bibliometric view. International Journal of Project Management , 27 (1), 1-18. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.10.007 · DOI
  8. [8]8. Backhaus, K., Luegger, K., & Koch, M. (2011). The structure and evolution of businessto-business marketing: A citation and co-citation analysis. Industrial Marketing Management , 40 (6, SI), 940-951. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.024 · DOI
  9. [9]9. Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek program for large network analysis. Connections , 21 (2), 47-57.
  10. [10]10. Baumgartner, H. (2010). Bibliometric reflections on the history of consumer research. Journal of Consumer Psychology , 20 (3), 233-238. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.002 · DOI
  11. [11]11. Benavides-Velasco, C. A., Quintana-García, C., & Guzmán-Parra, V. F. (2011). Trends in family business research. Small Business Economics , 40 (1), 41-57. doi:10.1007/s11187-011-9362-3 · DOI
  12. [12]12. Bernroider, E. W., Pilkington, A., & Córdoba, J.-R. (2013). Research in information systems: a study of diversity and inter-disciplinary discourse in the AIS basket journals between 1995 and 2011. Journal of Information Technology , 28 (1), 74-89. doi:10.1057/jit.2013.5 · DOI
  13. [13]13. Bhupatiraju, S., Nomaler, Ö., Triulzi, G., & Verspagen, B. (2012). Knowledge flows Analyzing the core literature of innovation, entrepreneurship and science and technology studies. Research Policy , 41 (7), 1205-1218. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.011 · DOI
  14. [14]14. Biemans, W., Griffin, A., & Moenaert, R. (2007). Twenty years of the Journal of product innovation management: History, participants, and knowledge stock and flows. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 24 (3), 193-213. doi:10.1111/j.15405885.2007.00245.x · DOI
  15. [15]15. Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM , 55 (4), 7784.
  16. [16]16. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , 2008 (10), P10008. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [18]18. Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology , 37 (1), 179-255. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aris.1440370106/full · DOI
  18. [19]19. Boyack, K., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 61 (12), 23892404. doi:10.1002/asi · DOI
  19. [20]20. Boyack, K., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics , 64 (3), 351-374. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/Q282602257566164.pdf
  20. [21]21. Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2014). Creation of a highly detailed, dynamic, global model and map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 65 (4), 670-685. doi:10.1002/asi.22990 · DOI
  21. [22]22. Calabretta, G., Durisin, B., & Ogliengo, M. (2011). Uncovering the Intellectual Structure of Research in Business Ethics: A Journey Through the History, the Classics, and the Pillars of Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics , 104 (4), 499-524. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0924-8 · DOI
  22. [23]23. Calero-Medina, C., & van Leeuwen, T. (2012). Seed Journal Citation Network Maps: A Method Based on Network Theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 63 (6), 1226-1234. doi:10.1002/asi · DOI
  23. [24]24. Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information , 22 (2), 191-235. doi:10.1177/053901883022002003 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [25]25. Carvalho, M. M., Fleury, A., & Lopes, A. P. (2013). An overview of the literature on technology roadmapping (TRM): Contributions and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , 80 (7), 1418-1437. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162512002934Casillas, J., & Acedo, F. (2007). Evolution of the intellectual structure of family business literature: A bibliometric study of FBR. Family Business Review , 20 (2), 141-162.
  25. [26]26. Chabowski, B. R., Hult, G. T. M., & Mena, J. A. (2011). The Retailing Literature as a Basis for Franchising Research: Using Intellectual Structure to Advance Theory. Journal of Retailing , 87 (3, SI), 269-284. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2011.04.001 · DOI
  26. [27]27. Chabowski, B. R., Mena, J. A., & Gonzalez-Padron, T. L. (2011). The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958-2008: a basis for future research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , 39 (1), 55-70.
  27. [28]28. Chabowski, B. R., Samiee, S., & Hult, G. T. M. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of the global branding literature and a research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies , 44 (6), 622-634. doi:10.1057/jibs.2013.20 · DOI
  28. [29]29. Chang, C.-C., & Ho, Y.-S. (2010). Bibliometric analysis of financial crisis research. African Journal of Business Management , 4 (18), 3898-3910.
  29. [30]30. Charvet, F. F., Cooper, M. C., & Gardner, J. T. (2008). The Intellectual Structure of Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Approach. Journal of Business Logistics , 29 (1), 47+.
  30. [31]31. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 57 (3), 359-377.
  31. [32]32. Cobo, M. J., Lopez-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study Among Tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology .
  32. [33]33. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics , 5 (1), 146166. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002 · DOI
  33. [34]34. Cobo, M., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2012). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 3 (8), 1609-1630. doi:10.1002/asi · DOI
  34. [36]36. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly , 35 (1), 128-152.
  35. [37]37. Collberg, C., Kobourov, S., Nagra, J., Pitts, J., & Wampler, K. (2003). A system for graph-based visualization of the evolution of software. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Software visualization - SoftVis '03 (p. 77). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/774833.774844 · DOI
  36. [38]38. Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A Review and Evaluation of Exploratory Factor Analysis Practices in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods , 6 (2), 147-168. doi:10.1177/1094428103251541 · DOI
  37. [39]39. Coombes, P. H., & Nicholson, J. D. (2013). Business models and their relationship with marketing: A systematic literature review. Industrial Marketing Management , 42 (5), - 656-664. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850113 000734
  38. [40]40. Cornelius, B., Landstrom, H., & Persson, O. (2006). Entrepreneurial studies: The dynamic research front of a developing social science. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 30 (3), 375-398.
  39. [41]41. Cornelius, B., & Persson, O. (2006). Who's who in venture capital research. Technovation , 26 (2), 142-150.
  40. [42]42. Coulter, N., Monarch, I., & Konda, S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 49 (13), 1206-1223. doi:10.1002/(SICI)10974571(1998)49:13<1206::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI
  41. [43]43. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communication . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  42. [44]44. Di Guardo, M. C., & Harrigan, K. R. (2012). Mapping research on strategic alliances and innovation: a co-citation analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer , 37 , 789-811. doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9239-2 · DOI
  43. [45]45. Di Stefano, G., Gambardella, A., & Verona, G. (2012). Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions. Research Policy , 41 (8), 1283-1295. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.021 · DOI
  44. [47]47. Durisin, B., Calabretta, G., & Parmeggiani, V. (2010). The Intellectual Structure of Product Innovation Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1984-2004. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 27 (3), 437-451.
  45. [48]48. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods , 4 (3), 272-299.
  46. [49]49. Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy , 41 (7), 1132-1153. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008 · DOI
  47. [50]50. Fagerberg, J., Landström, H., & Martin, B. R. (2012). Exploring the emerging knowledge base of 'the knowledge society.' Research Policy , 41 (7), 1121-1131. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.007 · DOI
  48. [51]51. Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies - The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy , 38 (2), 218-233. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.006 · DOI
  49. [52]52. Ferreira, M. A. S. P. V., Pinto, C. S. F., Serra, F. A. R., & Santos, J. C. (2013). A Bibliometric Study of John Dunning's Contribution to International Business Research. Review of Business Management , 15 (46), 56-75. doi:10.7819/rbgn.v15i46.1163 · DOI
  50. [53]53. Fischbach, K., Putzke, J., & Schoder, D. (2011). Co-authorship networks in electronic markets research. Electronic Markets , 21 (1), 19-40. doi:10.1007/s12525-011-0051-5 · DOI
  51. [54]54. Fortunato, S. (2010). Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports , 486 (3-5), 75-174. Physics and Society; Statistical Mechanics; Information Retrieval; Biological Physics; Computational Physics; Quantitative Methods. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  52. [55]55. Galvagno, M. (2011). The intellectual structure of the anti-consumption and consumer resistance field An author co-citation analysis. European Journal of Marketing , 45 (1112), 1688-1701. doi:10.1108/03090561111167441 · DOI
  53. [56]56. Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics , 1 (4), 359-375.
  54. [57]57. Gartner, W. B., Davidsson, P., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). Are you talking to me? The nature of community in entrepreneurship scholarship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 30 (3), 321-331.
  55. [58]58. Gerdsri, N., Kongthon, A., & Vatananan, R. S. (2013). Mapping the knowledge evolution and professional network in the field of technology roadmapping: a bibliometric analysis. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , 25 (4), 403-422. doi:10.1080/09537325.2013.774350 · DOI
  56. [59]59. Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2012). Using 'core documents' for detecting and labelling new emerging topics. Scientometrics , 91 (2), 399-416. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0591-7 · DOI
  57. [60]60. Gmür, M. (2003). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics , 57 (1), 27-57.
  58. [61]61. Gregoire, D. A., Noel, M. X., Dery, R., & Bechard, J. P. (2006). Is there conceptual convergence in entrepreneurship research? A co-citation analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981-2004. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 30 (3), 333-373. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00124.x · DOI
  59. [62]62. Gundolf, K., & Filser, M. (2012). Management Research and Religion: A Citation Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics , 112 (1), 177-185. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1240-7 · DOI
  60. [63]63. Hanisch, B., & Wald, A. (2012). A Bibliometric View on the Use of Contingency Theory in Project Management Research. Project Management Journal , 43 (3), 4-23. doi:10.1002/pmj.21267 · DOI
  61. [64]64. He, Q. (1998). Knowledge Discovery through Co-Word Analysis. Library Trends , 48 (1), 133-59. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ595487
  62. [65]65. Herbst, U., Voeth, M., & Meister, C. (2011). What do we know about buyer-seller negotiations in marketing research? A status quo analysis. Industrial Marketing Management , 40 (6, SI), 967-978. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.07.004 · DOI
  63. [66]66. Hoffman, D. L., & Holbrook, M. B. (1993). The Intellectual Structure of Consumer Research - A Bibliometric Study of Author Cocitations In The 1st 15 Years of the Journal of Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research , 19 (4), 505-517. doi:10.1086/209319 · DOI
  64. [67]67. Huang, C.-Y., & Ho, Y.-S. (2011). Historical research on corporate governance: A bibliometric analysis. African Journal of Business Management , 5 (2), 276-284.
  65. [68]68. Jarneving, B. (2005). A comparison of two bibliometric methods for mapping of the research front. Scientometrics , 65 (2), 245-263. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0270-7 · DOI
  66. [69]69. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy , 26 (1), 1-18. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1 · DOI
  67. [70]70. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation , 14 (1), 10-25. doi:10.1002/asi.5090140103 · DOI
  68. [71]71. Keupp, M. M., Palmié, M., & Gassmann, O. (2012). The Strategic Management of Innovation: A Systematic Review and Paths for Future Research. International Journal of Management Reviews , 14 , 367-390. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00321.x · DOI
  69. [72]72. Kim, J., & McMillan, S. J. (2008). Evaluation of Internet advertising research - A bibliometric analysis of citations from key sources. Journal of Advertising , 37 (1), 99112. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367370108 · DOI
  70. [73]73. Kobourov, S. G. (2012). Spring Embedders and Force Directed Graph Drawing Algorithms, 23. Computational Geometry; Discrete Mathematics; Data Structures and Algorithms. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.3011 · arXiv
  71. [74]74. Kraus, S. (2011). State-of-the-art current research in international entrepreneurship: A citation analysis. African Journal of Business Management , 5 (3), 1020-1038.
  72. [75]75. Landström, H., Harirchi, G., & Åström, F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy , 41 (7), 1154-1181.
  73. [76]76. Leone, R. P., Robinson, L. M., Bragge, J., & Somervuori, O. (2012). A citation and profiling analysis of pricing research from 1980 to 2010. Journal of Business Research , 65 (7), 1010-1024. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.04.007 · DOI
  74. [78]78. Liu, X., Glänzel, W., & Moor, B. (2012). Optimal and hierarchical clustering of largescale hybrid networks for scientific mapping. Scientometrics , 91 (2), 473-493. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0600-x · DOI
  75. [79]79. Lu, K., & Wolfram, D. (2012). Measuring Author Research Relatedness : A Comparison of Word-Based , Topic-Based , and Author Cocitation Approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 63 (10), 1973-1986.
  76. [80]80. Ma, Z. (2009). The Status of Contemporary Business Ethics Research: Present and Future. Journal of Business Ethics , 90 (3), 255-265. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0420-6 · DOI
  77. [81]81. Ma, Z., Lee, Y., & Yu, K.-H. (2008). Ten years of conflict management studies: themes, concepts and relationships. International Journal of Conflict Management , 19 (3), 234248. doi:10.1108/10444060810875796 · DOI
  78. [82]82. Ma, Z., Liang, D., Yu, K.-H., & Lee, Y. (2012). Most cited business ethics publications: mapping the intellectual structure of business ethics studies in 2001-2008. Business Ethics: A European Review , 21 (3), 286-297. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2012.01652.x · DOI
  79. [83]83. Ma, Z., & Yu, K.-H. (2010). Research paradigms of contemporary knowledge management studies: 1998-2007. Journal of Knowledge Management , 14 (2), 175-189. doi:10.1108/13673271011032337 · DOI
  80. [84]84. Marion, L. (2002). A tri-citation analysis exploring the citation image of Kurt Lewin. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 39 (1), 313. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/meet.1450390101/full · DOI
  81. [85]85. Marsilio, M., Cappellaro, G., & Cuccurullo, C. (2011). The Intellectual Structure of Research Into PPPS: A bibliometric analysis. Public Management Review , 13 (6), 763782. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.539112 · DOI
  82. [86]86. Martin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research Policy , 41 (7), 1219-1239. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012 · DOI
  83. [87]87. Martin, B. R., Nightingale, P., & Yegros-Yegros, A. (2012). Science and technology studies: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy , 41 (7), 1182-1204. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733312000716
  84. [88]88. McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 41 (6), 433443. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)10974571(199009)41:6<433::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-Q/full · DOI
  85. [89]89. McCain, K. W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 42 (4), 290-296. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199105)42:4<290::AIDASI5>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
  86. [90]90. McCain, K. W. (2009). Using tricitation to dissect the citation image: Conrad Hal Waddington and the rise of evolutionary developmental biology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 60 (7), 1301-1319. doi:10.1002/asi · DOI
  87. [91]91. McCain, K. W., & McCain, R. a. (2002). Mapping 'a beautiful mind:' A comparison of the author cocitation PFNets for John Nash, John Harsanyi, and Reinhard Selten-the three winners of the 1994 Nobel Prize for Economics. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 39 (1), 552-553. doi:10.1002/meet.14503901108 · DOI
  88. [92]92. McMillan, G. S. (2008). Mapping the invisible colleges of R&D Management. R&D Management , 38 (1), 69-83.
  89. [93]93. Meyer, M., Pereira, T. S., Persson, O., & Granstrand, O. (2004). The scientometric world of Keith Pavitt - A tribute to his contributions to research policy and patent analysis. Research Policy , 33 (9), 1405-1417. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.008 · DOI
  90. [94]94. Montiel Campos, H., Sole Parellada, F., & Palma, Y. (2012). Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Entrepreneurship Research: revisiting the invisible college. RBGN-Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios , 14 (42), 41-58.
  91. [95]95. Muñoz-Leiva, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J., & Martínez-Fiestas, M. (2013). Detecting salient themes in financial marketing research from 1961 to 2010. The Service Industries Journal , 33 (9-10), 925-940. doi:10.1080/02642069.2013.719884 · DOI
  92. [96]96. Neely, A. (2005). The evolution of performance measurement research - Developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next. International Journal of Operations & Production Management , 25 (12), 1264-1277. doi:10.1108/01443570510633648 · DOI
  93. [97]97. Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal , 29 (3), 319-336. doi:10.1002/smj.659 · DOI
  94. [98]98. Nosella, a., Cantarello, S., & Filippini, R. (2012). The intellectual structure of organizational ambidexterity: A bibliographic investigation into the state of the art. Strategic Organization , 10 (4), 450-465. doi:10.1177/1476127012457979 · DOI
  95. [99]99. Pasadeos, Y., Phelps, J., & Kim, B. H. (1998). Disciplinary impact of advertising scholars: Temporal comparisons of influential authors, works and research networks. Journal of Advertising , 27 (4), 53-70.
  96. [100]100. Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986-1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 45 (1), 31-38. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199401)45:1<31::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  97. [101]101. Persson, O. D., Danell, R., & Wiborg Schneider, J. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In F. Åström, R. Danell, B. Larsen, & J. Schneider (Eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday (pp. 9-24). Leuven, Belgium: International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
  98. [102]102. Phillips, D. M., Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (1999). Influence in the evolving citation network of the journal of consumer research. In L. Arnould, EJ and Scott (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, VOL 26 (Vol. 26, pp. 203-210).
  99. [103]103. Pilkington, A., & Chai, K.-H. (2008). Research themes, concepts and relationships - A study of International Journal of Service Industry Management (1990-2005). International Journal of Service Industry Management , 19 (1), 83-110. doi:10.1108/09564230810855725 · DOI
  100. [104]104. Pilkington, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2006). Operations management themes, concepts and relationships: a forward retrospective of IJOPM. International Journal of Operations & Production Management , 26 (11-12), 1255-1275. doi:10.1108/01443570610705854 · DOI
  101. [105]105. Pilkington, A., & Lawton, T. C. (2013). Divided by a Common Language? Transnational Insights into Epistemological and Methodological Approaches to Strategic Management Research in English-Speaking Countries. Long Range Planning . doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.001 · DOI
  102. [106]106. Pilkington, A., & Liston-Heyes, C. (1999). Is production and operations management a discipline? A citation/co-citation study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management , 19 (1), 7-20. doi:10.1108/01443579910244188 · DOI · Paper page
  103. [107]107. Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009). The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management-1980-2006: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management , 27 (3), 185-202. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
  104. [108]108. Pilkington, A., & Teichert, T. (2006). Management of technology: themes, concepts and relationships. Technovation , 26 (3), 288-299. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.009 · DOI
  105. [110]110. Raasch, C., Lee, V., Spaeth, S., & Herstatt, C. (2013). The rise and fall of interdisciplinary research: The case of open source innovation. Research Policy , 42 (5), 1138-1151. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733313000279
  106. [111]111. Raghuram, S., Tuertscher, P., & Garud, R. (2010). Mapping the Field of Virtual Work: A Cocitation Analysis. Information Systems Research , 21 (4), 983-999. doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0227 · DOI
  107. [113]113. Reader, D., & Watkins, D. (2006). The social and collaborative nature of entrepreneurship scholarship: A co-citation and perceptual analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 30 (3), 417-441. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00127.x · DOI
  108. [114]114. Ronda-Pupo, G. A., & Guerras-Martin, L. A. (2012). Dynamics of the evolution of the strategy concept 1962-2008: a co-word analysis. Strategic Management Journal , 33 (2), 162-188. doi:10.1002/smj.948 · DOI
  109. [115]115. Samiee, S., & Chabowski, B. R. (2012). Knowledge structure in international marketing: a multi-method bibliometric analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , 40 (2), 364-386. doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0296-8 · DOI
  110. [117]117. Schildt, H. A., & Mattsson, J. T. (2006). A dense network sub-grouping algorithm for cocitation analysis and its implementation in the software tool Sitkis. Scientometrics , 67 (1), 143-163. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0054-8 · DOI
  111. [118]118. Schildt, H. A., Zahra, S. A., & Sillanpaa, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 30 (3), 399-415.
  112. [119]119. Schmidt, F. (2008). Meta-Analysis: A Constantly Evolving Research Integration Tool. Organizational Research Methods , 11 (1), 96-113. doi:10.1177/1094428107303161 · DOI
  113. [120]120. Shafique, M. (2013). Thinking inside the box? Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988-2008). Strategic Management Journal , 34 (1), 62-93. doi:10.1002/smj.2002 · DOI
  114. [121]121. Shilbury, D. (2011). A Bibliometric Study of Citations to Sport Management and Marketing Journals. Journal of Sport Management , 25 (5), 423-444.
  115. [122]122. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 24 (4), 265-269.
  116. [123]123. Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 50 (9), 799-813. Retrieved from http://svn.assembla.com/svn/awt/literature/1999-small.pdf
  117. [125]125. Thijs, B., Schiebel, E., & Glänzel, W. (2013). Do second-order similarities provide added-value in a hybrid approach? Scientometrics , 96 (3), 667-677. doi:10.1007/s11192012-0896-1 · DOI
  118. [126]126. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidenceinformed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management , 14 (3), 207-222. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · DOI · Paper page
  119. [127]127. Tu, P. P.-N. (2011). A study of influential authors, works and research network of consumer behavior research. African Journal of Business Management , 5 (23), 98389854.
  120. [128]128. Usdiken, B., & Pasadeos, Y. (1995). Organizational analysis in North-America and Europe - a comparison of cocitation networks. Organization Studies , 16 (3), 503-526. doi:10.1177/017084069501600306 · DOI
  121. [129]129. Uslay, C., Morgan, R. E., & Sheth, J. N. (2009). Peter Drucker on marketing: an exploration of five tenets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , 37 (1), 47-60. doi:10.1007/s11747-008-0099-8 · DOI
  122. [130]130. Uysal, O. O. (2010). Business Ethics Research with an Accounting Focus: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1988 to 2007. Journal of Business Ethics , 93 (1), 137-160. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0187-9 · DOI
  123. [131]131. Vogel, R. (2012). The Visible Colleges of Management and Organization Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis of Academic Journals. Organization Studies , 33 (8), 1015-1043. doi:10.1177/0170840612448028 · DOI
  124. [132]132. Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The Dynamic Capability View in Strategic Management: A Bibliometric Review. International Journal of Management Reviews , 15 (4), 426-446. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12000 · DOI
  125. [133]133. Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2010). Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field. Organization Science , 21 (4), 931-951. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0503 · DOI
  126. [134]134. Wallace, M. L., Gingras, Y., & Duhon, R. (2009). A new approach for detecting scientific specialties from raw cocitation networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 60 (2), 240-246. doi:10.1002/asi.20987 · DOI
  127. [135]135. Wallin, J. A. (2005). Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology , 97 (5), 261-275.
  128. [136]136. Wallin, M. (2012). The bibliometric structure of spin-off literature. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice , 14 (2), 162-177.
  129. [137]137. Walter, C., & Ribiere, V. (2013). A citation and co-citation analysis of 10 years of KM theory and practices. Knowledge Management Research & Practice , 11 (3), 221-229. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.25 · DOI
  130. [138]138. White, H. D. (2003). Author cocitation analysis and Pearson's r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 54 (13), 1250-1259. doi:10.1002/asi.10325 · DOI
  131. [139]139. White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 32 (3), 163-171. doi:10.1002/asi.4630320302 · DOI
  132. [140]140. White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 49 (4), 327-355. doi:10.1002/(SICI) · DOI
  133. [142]142. Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Evolution of Research Activities and Intellectual Influences in Information Science 1996 - 2005: Introducing Author BibliographicCoupling Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 59 (1998), 2070-2086. doi:10.1002/asi · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zupic, I., & Čater, T.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
ORCID
Čater, Tomaž
Venue
Organizational Research Methods
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2014-12-22
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
429-472
ISSN
  • 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7425
DOI
10.1177/1094428114562629
OpenAlex
W3125707221
Cited by
7,495
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1584 · 2025: 1401 · 2024: 1238 · 2023: 1148 · 2022: 897 · 2021: 568 · 2020: 340 · 2019: 174 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
20.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Organizational Research Methods (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
Keywords
bibliometric methods, citation analysis, co-citation analysis, co-word analysis, literature review methodology, intellectual structure, research evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review