Cited by 101scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsWeb visibility and informetrics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology

García‐Pérez, Miguel A.·2010·Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

DOI 10.1002/asi.21372

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Hirsch's h index is becoming the standard measure of an individual's research accomplishments. The aggregation of individuals' measures is also the basis for global measures at institutional or national levels. To investigate whether the h index can be reliably computed through alternative sources of citation records, the Web of Science (WoS), PsycINFO and Google Scholar (GS) were used to collect citation records for known publications of four Spanish psychologists. Compared with WoS, PsycINFO included a larger percentage of publication records, whereas GS outperformed WoS and PsycINFO in this respect. Compared with WoS, PsycINFO retrieved a larger number of citations in unique areas of psychology, but it retrieved a smaller number of citations in areas that are close to statistics or the neurosciences, whereas GS retrieved the largest numbers of citations in all cases. Incorrect citations were scarce in Wos (0.3%), more prevalent in PsycINFO (1.1%), and overwhelming in GS (16.5%). All platforms retrieved unique citations, the largest set coming from GS. WoS and PsycINFO cover distinct areas of psychology unevenly, thus applying different penalties on the h index of researches working in different fields. Obtaining fair and accurate h indices required the union of citations retrieved by all three platforms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/asi.21372

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669
Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf · Cited by 5,039
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Seglen, P. O. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497 · Cited by 2,447
Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20677 · Cited by 974
h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields
Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001 · Cited by 841
Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals
Kulkarni, A. V. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1307 · Cited by 821
Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review
Nederhof, A. J. (2006) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2 · Cited by 785
Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., & Wang, L. (2006) · Biomedical Digital Libraries · doi:10.1186/1742-5581-3-7 · Cited by 752
Journal impact factor: a brief review.
Garfield, E. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 744
Comparing alternatives to the web of science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature
Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001 · Cited by 733

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 100 references

1 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

Jacsó P., 2005, As we may search – Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation‐b ased and citation‐e nhanced databases, Current Science, 89, 1537
Jacsó P., 2005, Digital libraries: Implementing strategies and sharing experiences (pp. 360–369)
Osca‐Lluch J., 2009, Consecuencias de los errores en las referencias bibliográficas [Consequences of the error in bibliographical references: The specific case of the journal Psicothema], El caso de la revista Psicothema. Psicothema, 300
Salgado J.F., 2007, La productividad científica y el índice h de Hirsch de la psicología social española: Convergencia entre indicadores de productividad y comparación con otrasáreas [Scientific productivity and Hirsch's h Index of Spanish social psychology: Convergence between productivity indexes and comparison with other areas], Psicothema, 19, 179
Shadbolt N., 2006, Open access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects (pp. 195–206)
Topo Universitario. (2008) Factor de impacto del International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology [Impact factor of the International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology]. Retrieved May 19 2010 fromhttp://unnombrealazar.blogspot.com/2008/09/factor‐de‐impacto‐del‐international.html
Vaughan L., 2008, A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from university, Scientometrics, 81, 587
Walters W.H., 2007, Google Scholar coverage of a multidisciplinary field. Information Processing and Management, 43Web sources, Scientometrics, 74, 317

Sorted by citations

A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,356
A Review of Theory and Practice in Scientometrics
Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002 · Cited by 1,002
Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic
Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00112 · Cited by 865
Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature
Halevi, G., Moed, H., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.005 · Cited by 488
The Use of Bibliometrics to Measure Research Performance in Education Sciences
Diem, A., & Wolter, S. C. (2012) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-012-9264-5 · Cited by 338
Which Type of Citation Analysis Generates the Most Accurate Taxonomy of Scientific and Technical Knowledge?
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23734 · Cited by 360
Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis
Aguillo, I. F. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0582-8 · Cited by 302
The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study
de Winter, J., ZADPOOR, A. A., & Dodou, D. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1089-2 · Cited by 275
A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners
Harzing, A.-W. K. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0777-7 · Cited by 229
Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough
Boeker, M., Vach, W., & Motschall, E. (2013) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-131 · Cited by 225
“Several reports from different research areas underpin these high coverage results [35,36].”
Result
Empirical Analysis and Classification of Database Errors in Scopus and Web of Science
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.003 · Cited by 225
Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases
Gusenbauer, M. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04289-7 · Cited by 211
Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparison
Martín-Martín, A., Orduña-Malea, E., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2820-9 · Cited by 228
Abandonment of personal quantification: A review and empirical study investigating reasons for wearable activity tracking attrition
Attig, C., & Franke, T. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.025 · Cited by 187
Evaluating Journal Quality: A Review of Journal Citation Indicators and Ranking in Business and Management
Mingers, J., & Yang, L. (2017) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.07.058 · Cited by 184
How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations
Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1161-y · Cited by 143
Does massive funding support of researchers work?: Evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative
Fedderke, J. W., & Goldschmidt, M. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.009 · Cited by 98
A bibliometric visualization of the economics and sociology of wealth inequality: a world apart?
Korom, P. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-03000-z · Cited by 99
Deduplicating records in systematic reviews: there are free, accurate automated ways to do so
Guimarães, N. S., Ferreira, A. J. F., Ribeiro‐Silva, R. D. C., de Paula, A. A., Lisboa, C. S., Magno, L., Ichiara, M. Y., & Barreto, M. L. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.10.009 · Cited by 77
Facebook as a learning environment for language teaching and learning: A critical analysis of the literature from 2010 to 2017
Barrot, J. S. (2018) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12295 · Cited by 72
The h‐index, h‐core citation rate and the bibliometric profile of the Scopus database
Jacsó, P. (2011) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521111151487 · Cited by 66
"Are you gonna publish that?" Peer-reviewed publication outcomes of doctoral dissertations in psychology
Evans, S. C., Amaro, C. M., Herbert, R. S., Blossom, J. B., & Roberts, M. C. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192219 · Cited by 57
Drowning in the flood of information: a meta-analysis on the relation between information overload, behaviour, experience, and health and moderating factors
Graf, B., & Antoni, C. H. (2023) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2022.2118051 · Cited by 52
The relationship between information characteristics and information overload at the workplace - a meta-analysis
Graf, B., & Antoni, C. H. (2020) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2020.1813111 · Cited by 66
The Landscape of Research on Prior Knowledge and Learning: a Bibliometric Analysis
Bittermann, A., McNamara, D. S., Simonsmeier, B. A., & Schneider, M. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09775-9 · Cited by 77
Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology?
König, C. J., Fell, C. B., Kellnhofer, L., & Schui, G. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1646-y · Cited by 51
Graduate students appreciate Google Scholar, but still find use for libraries
Wu, M., & Chen, S.-C. (2014) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-08-2012-0102 · Cited by 44
Using Google Scholar institutional level data to evaluate the quality of university research
Mingers, J., O’Hanley, J. R., & Okunola, M. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2532-6 · Cited by 36
Can the impact of non‐ W estern academic books be measured? An investigation of G oogle B ooks and G oogle S cholar for M alaysia
Abrizah, A., & Thelwall, M. A. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23145 · Cited by 31
Do Scopus and WoS Correct “Old” Omitted Citations?
Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1867-8 · Cited by 31
Assessing the scientific productivity of Italian forest researchers using the Web of Science, SCOPUS and SCIMAGO databases
Chirici, G. (2012) · iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry · doi:10.3832/ifor0613-005 · Cited by 34
Benefits to the Spanish research community of regional content expansion in Web of Science
Purnell, P. J., & Quevedo-Blasco, R. (2013) · International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology · doi:10.1016/s1697-2600(13)70018-8 · Cited by 29
Types of Errors Hiding in Google Scholar Data
Sauvayre, R. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/28354 · Cited by 32
Strange attractors in the Web of Science database
García-Pérez, M. Á. (2010) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.006 · Cited by 24
Self-citation
A bibliometric study of human–computer interaction research activity in the Nordic-Baltic Eight countries
Sandnes, F. E. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-03940-z · Cited by 24
A simple back-of-the-envelope test for self-citations using Google Scholar author profiles
Sandnes, F. E. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03521-6 · Cited by 23
Who is going to win the next Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Fellowship Award? Evaluating researchers by mining bibliographic data
Rokach, L., Kalech, M., Blank, I., & Stern, R. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21638 · Cited by 20
Limited validity of equations to predict the future h index
García-Pérez, M. Á. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-0979-7 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Has hosting on science direct improved the visibility of Latin American scholarly journals? A preliminary analysis of data quality
Ainsworth, S., & Russell, J. M. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2725-7 · Cited by 18
An extension of the h index that covers the tail and the top of the citation curve and allows ranking researchers with similar h
García-Pérez, M. Á. (2012) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.004 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
The objectivity of national research foundation peer review in South Africa assessed against bibliometric indexes
Fedderke, J. W. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-0981-0 · Cited by 18
The h‐index, h‐core citation rate and the bibliometric profile of the Web of Science database in three configurations
Jacsó, P. (2011) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521111176525 · Cited by 17
Is there an imbalance in the supply and demand for universal accessibility knowledge? Twenty years of UAIS papers viewed through the lens of WCAG
Sandnes, F. E. (2021) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-021-00834-y · Cited by 14
Starstruck by journal prestige and citation counts? On students’ bias and perceptions of trustworthiness according to clues in publication references
Eika, E., & Sandnes, F. E. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04521-4 · Cited by 15
Research performance of academic psychologists in the United Kingdom
Lai, K. A., Saxena, G., & Allen, P. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04424-4 · Cited by 13
Current Interventions for the Digital Onboarding of First-Year Students in Higher Education Institutions: A Scoping Review
Schilling, H. R., Wittner, B., & Kauffeld, S. (2022) · Education sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12080551 · Cited by 13
Data inaccuracy quantification and uncertainty propagation for bibliometric indicators
Donner, P. (2024) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvae047 · Cited by 14
A large-scale semi-automated approach for assessing document-type classification errors in bibliometric databases
Maisano, D. A., Mastrogiacomo, L., Ferrara, L., & Franceschini, F. (2025) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-025-05244-y · Cited by 11
A literature review of overnight work travel within individual, family and social contexts
Borowski, S. C., Naar, J. J., Zvonkovic, A., & Swenson, A. R. (2018) · Community Work & Family · doi:10.1080/13668803.2018.1463970 · Cited by 11
Quantifying the internationality and multidisciplinarity of authors and journals using ecological statistics
Calver, M., Bryant, K. A., & Wardell‐Johnson, G. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2692-z · Cited by 10
Detecting incoherent citation data among three bibliometric platforms: OpenAlex, Scopus and Web of Science
Rodrigues, D., Lopes, A. L., & Batista, F. (2025) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515251330579 · Cited by 11
Research output and impact of the fields of management, economics, and sociology in spain and france: An analysis using google scholar and scopus
Gantman, E. R., & Dabos, M. P. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24020 · Cited by 9
Scholarly productivity and citation impact of Australian academic psychologists
Mazzucchelli, T. G., Burton, E., & Roberts, L. D. (2019) · Australian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajpy.12248 · Cited by 9
Diversity of success: measuring the scholarly performance diversity of tenured professors in the Israeli academia
Weinberger, M., & Zhitomirsky‐Geffet, M. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03823-9 · Cited by 8
Citation analysis of Ph.D. theses with data from Scopus and Google Books
Donner, P. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04173-w · Cited by 8
Outside the Classroom and Beyond Psychology
Tomcho, T. J., Foels, R., Walter, M. I., Yerkes, K., Brady, B., Erdman, M., Dantoni, L., Venables, M., & Manry, A. (2014) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628314562661 · Cited by 8
Diferencias y evolución del impacto académico en los perfiles de Google Scholar Citations: Una aplicación de árboles de decisión
Ortega, J. L. (2015) · Revista española de Documentación Científica · doi:10.3989/redc.2015.4.1225 · Cited by 8
Scaling Scientometrics: Dimensions on Google BigQuery as an Infrastructure for Large-Scale Analysis
Hook, D. W., & Porter, S. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2021.656233 · Cited by 8
Disseminating High-Impact Social Work Scholarship: A Longitudinal Examination of 5-Year Citation Count Correlates
Hodge, D. R., Victor, B. G., Grogan‐Kaylor, A. C., & Perron, B. E. (2017) · Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research · doi:10.1086/691463 · Cited by 7
Lost & Forgotten: An Index of the Famous Works Which Sociology Has Left Behind
McGail, A. (2021) · The American Sociologist · doi:10.1007/s12108-021-09490-4 · Cited by 7
RAM the PI-BETA, C3PO - what the H-STAR happened to my promotion application? Or: The pros and cons of bibliometric evaluations of researchers
Calver, M. (2013) · doi:10.7882/fs.2013.019 · Cited by 7
Are Keynote and Invited Speakers at State Behavior Analytic Conferences Experts on Their Presentation Topics?
Boggs, M. A., Rapp, J. T., Cook, J. L., Richling, S. M., & Mohamed, R. (2025) · Behavior Analysis in Practice · doi:10.1007/s40617-025-01051-2 · Cited by 6
The silver jubilee of the Nitric Oxide journal: From 1997 to 2021
Hassan, W., Zafar, M., Duarte, A. E., Kamdem, J. P., & da Rocha, J. B. T. (2022) · Nitric Oxide · doi:10.1016/j.niox.2022.05.003 · Cited by 6
On the meaningful and non-meaningful use of reference sets in bibliometrics
Bornmann, L., & Loet Leydesdorff, A. (2014) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.12.006 · Cited by 6
Structural elements of articles and diachronous citation analysis among top-ranking tourism journals (1990–2010)
Jiang, J., Woosnam, K. M., & Draper, J. (2014) · Tourism Management Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2014.06.004 · Cited by 7
Scholarish: Google Scholar and its Value to the Sciences
Gray, J. E., Hamilton, M. C., Hauser, A., Janz, M. M., Peters, J. P., & Taggart, F. (2012) · Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship · doi:10.29173/istl1559 · Cited by 6
On the possibilities of presenting the research performance of an institute over a long period of time: the case of the Institute of Information Science at the University of Graz in Austria
Reichmann, G., & Schlögl, C. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04377-8 · Cited by 5
How accurate are cited references in Iranian peer-reviewed journals?
Ghane, M. R. (2016) · Learned Publishing · doi:10.1002/leap.1000 · Cited by 4
Misreferencing Practice of Scientists: Inside Researchers’ Sociological and Bibliometric Profiles
Sauvayre, R. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.2022807 · Cited by 5
Identifying trends in information security and privacy concern research
Weinberger, M., & Bouhnik, D. (2023) · IFLA Journal · doi:10.1177/03400352231172805 · Cited by 4
Calciphylaxis and the Persistence of Medical Misinformation in the Era of Google
Granter, S. R., Laga, A. C., & Larson, A. R. (2015) · American Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1309/ajcpdmwvgkw9n1cu · Cited by 4
Framing gay men’s sexual relationships: A rapid review of the literature from 2011–2018
Lemay, K. R., McKie, R. M., Braham, J., Levere, D. D., Furman, E., Sasso, T., Coleman, T. A., & Travers, R. (2020) · The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality · doi:10.3138/cjhs.2019-0008 · Cited by 3
Citation-Based Findings are (Largely) a Function of Method of Analysis: A Comment on Black (2012)
Piotrowski, C. (2012) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/09.13.17.pr0.111.6.711-716 · Cited by 4
Keep Playing or Restart? Questions about the Evaluation of Video Game Addiction from a Systematic Review in the Context of COVID-19
Oceja, J., Villanueva‐Blasco, V. J., Vázquez‐Martínez, A., Villanueva-Silvestre, V., & Al‐Halabí, S. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15021456 · Cited by 3
The evolution of scientific literature as metastable knowledge states
Koneru, S., McCauley, D. R., Smith, M. C., Guarrera, D., Robinson, J., & Rajtmajer, S. M. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287226 · Cited by 3
Online supplemental information: a sizeable black hole for citations
García-Pérez, M. Á. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1348-x · Cited by 3
Self-citation
The Prestige of Social Scientists in Spain and France: An Examination of Their h-Index Values Using Scopus and Google Scholar
Dabos, M. P., Gantman, E. R., & Rodríguez, C. J. F. (2018) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-018-9358-0 · Cited by 3
Productividad científica y visibilidad de El Colegio de la Frontera Sur: 26 años de investigación multidisciplinaria en México
de Jesús‐Navarrete, A., Gómez-Morales, J. S., Zacarías-de-León, G., & Jacobson, B. (2023) · Investigación Bibliotecológica Archivonomía Bibliotecología e Información · doi:10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2023.95.58710 · Cited by 3
Coverage of highly-cited documents in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a multidisciplinary comparisonPreprint
Martín‐Martín, A., Orduña‐Malea, E., & López‐Cózar, E. D. (2018) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/hcx27 · Cited by 3
H-index and research evaluation: A suggested set of components for developing a comprehensive author-level index
Norouzi, A., Parsaei-Mohammadi, P., Zare‐Farashbandi, F., Zare–Farashbandi, E., & Geraei, E. (2024) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515241293761 · Cited by 2
Evaluation methods and empirical research on comprehensiveness, accuracy and timeliness of early access indexing in the Web of Science
Zhu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/01655515251379429 · Cited by 3
An Investigation of Information Usefulness of Google Scholar in Comparison with Web of Science
Kim, H.-J. (2014) · Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science · doi:10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.3.215 · Cited by 2
Searching Through Silos
Cook, S., Cochrane, L., & Corbett, J. (2020) · International Journal of E-Planning Research · doi:10.4018/ijepr.2020100102 · Cited by 2
Google Scholar as a data source for research assessment in the social sciences
Doğan, G. (2022) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781800372559.00018 · Cited by 2
The 100 most‐cited articles published in the Veterinary Ophthalmology journal between 1998 and 2022: A bibliometric study
Arad, D., Pe’er, O., & Ofri, R. (2023) · Veterinary Ophthalmology · doi:10.1111/vop.13097 · Cited by 2
Interviewing Highly Eminent Creators
Nakamura, J., & Fajans, J. (2014) · doi:10.1002/9781118367377.ch3 · Cited by 2
Errors in document-type classification: a focus on engineering publications and their publishers
Maisano, D., Ferrara, L., & Franceschini, F. (2025) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-025-05444-6 · Cited by 1
Rekreasyon Alanı Kültürel Miras Odaklı Bilimsel Araştırmaların Küresel Düzeyde Performans ve Kavramsal Yapısının Bibliyometrik Analizi [1991-2024]
Paylı, M., Çevik, O., & Yakar, M. (2025) · Kültürel Miras Araştırmaları · doi:10.59127/kulmira.1798570 · Cited by 1
Single versus dual document-type assignment: an empirical comparison of classification policies in Scopus and Web of Science databases
Maisano, D. A., Ferrara, L., & Franceschini, F. (2026) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-026-05602-4 · Cited by 1
Inovação Social nas Ciências Sociais: Uma Análise Bibliométrica de 2007 à 2017
Mukendi, J. T., Welchen, V., da Costa, L. F., Machado, V. D. C., Molle, F. D., Candaten, L., Comin, J., Chais, C., Fortes, V. M. M., Ganzer, P. P., et al. (2017) · Mostra de Iniciação Científica, Pós-graduação, Pesquisa e Extensão da UCS · doi:10.18226/610001/mostraxvii.2017.65 · Cited by 1
BIBLIOGRAPHY
(2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527681969.biblio
Bibliographic databases: Is The Journal of Wildlife Management being found?
(2015) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.898
Inovação Social nas Ciências Sociais: Uma Análise Bibliométrica de 2007 à 2017
Mukendi, J. T., Welchen, V., da Costa, L. F., Machado, V. D. C., Molle, F. D., Candaten, L., Comin, J., Chais, C., Fortes, V. M. M., Ganzer, P. P., et al. (2017) · Mostra de Iniciação Científica, Pós-graduação, Pesquisa e Extensão · doi:10.18226/35353535.v6.2017.66
An Analysis of International Conference Proceedings on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) from 2008 to 2020: A Data-Mining Mapping Analysis
Shehata, B., Tlili, A., & Huang, R. (2021) · International Conference on ICT & Accessibility (ICTA) · doi:10.1109/icta54582.2021.9809429
Twenty years of Collaborative Design, Visualization and Engineering: A Bibliometric Exploration
Sandnes, F. E. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71315-6_31
Use of Hypochlorous Acid in Infections: Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific LiteraturePreprint
ATEŞ, F. M. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.11.06.622311
Examining scholar-level publishing performance across bibliometric databases by cluster analysis
Pişirgen, A., Öztunç, F., & Peker, S. (2025) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-02-2024-0031
La quantification de la recherche scientifique et ses enjeux : bases de données, indicateurs et cartographie des données bibliométriques
Maddi, A. (2018) · doi:10.70675/4423a576z1b92z47d3z91a9z59b6a297f0bf
Analysis of Two Metrics for Keynote and Invited Speaker Expertise: A Replication and Extension in Canada
Mohamed, R., Cook, J. L., Boggs, M. A., & Rapp, J. T. (2026) · Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1002/bin.70104
Exploring the Links Between Ageism and Career Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Yu, Y., Beigi, M., & Parry, J. (2026) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/15344843261451382

Authors: García‐Pérez, M. A.
Venue: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Publisher: Wiley
Published: 2010-09-15
Volume: 61
Issue: 10
Pages: 2070-2085
ISSN: 1532-2882 (ISSN-L)
1532-2890
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21372
OpenAlex: W4250137533
Cited by: 101
References: 100
Citations by year: 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI: 6.00
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
Keywords: h-index, citation analysis, citation indexes, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, citation accuracy, publication records, research evaluation, psychology, bibliographic databases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks