How accurate are cited references in Iranian peer-reviewed journals?
Open accessAbstract
The references cited in scientific articles are as important as any other part of the paper, because of their usefulness to the scientific community and to abstracting and indexing services and citation databases. I studied inaccuracies in references and in-text citations in sample of 97 of the 519 peer-reviewed journals accredited by the Iranian National Commission for Journal Accreditation Policy. The results showed 36.6% as the average percentage error rate (range 5.6% to 61.3%). The mean number of errors in cited references was 2.7 per article. Problems with referencing are a concern in all scientific disciplines, causing serious impact on the tracking of ideas.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
2 of 9 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
86% (approximately 84) of the journals included in the study referred authors to a specific style manual.
“although 86% (approximately 84) of the journals included in this study referred authors to a specific style manual”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The rate of error for neglecting to add lower-case letters to distinguish between two or more publications by the same author in the same year was 8.6% (3,406).
“The rate of error for neglecting to add lower-case letters to distinguish between two or more publications by the same author in the same year was 8.6% (3,406).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
8,683 cited references did not match any in-text citations (11.6%).
“8,683 cited references that did not match any in-text citations (11.6%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
84.4% of the journals used an ad hoc format.
“Although most journals (86%) provided specific rules for citation and reference formats, 84.4% of the journals used an ad hoc format.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among online reference errors, 3,401 (12.5%) were incorrect or incomplete URLs.
“that the URL is incorrect or incomplete (3,401, 12.5%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Errors with respect to book references, including book title, publisher's location, and publisher's name, had an error rate of 15.0%.
“Errors with respect to book references, including the book title, publisher's location and publisher's name, revealed an error rate of 15.0%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Neglecting to cite the primary source together with a secondary source for indirect citations had an error rate of 9.0% (3,565).
“The error rate of 9.0% (3,565) serves as a warning”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Misspellings between the text citation and references accounted for 11.0% (4,357) of errors.
“Misspellings between the text citation and references accounted for 11.0% (4,357) errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The rate of error in transposition of the author's surname and first name was 7.0% (2,773).
“I found 7.0% (2,773) of error in transposition of the author's surname and first name.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The mean percentage error rate across articles was 36.6%, with a range of 5.6% to 61.3%.
“The results showed 36.6% as the average percentage error rate (range 5.6% to 61.3%).”
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
“The mean percentage error rate across articles was 36.6% (range 5.6% to 61.3%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The sample of 97 journals is representative of the 519 accredited Iranian peer-reviewed journals.
- Rests on an assumption: Deviations from standard citation styles constitute citation errors.
- Also stated in: § RESULTS · plain
- Findingown data
The average number of errors per journal analysed was 690.
“The average number of errors per journal analysed was 690.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The mean number of errors for all cited references and in-text citations was 2.7 per article.
“The mean number of errors for all cited references and in-text citation was 2.7 per article.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
More than two thirds of the journals (80.4%, 68) used an ad hoc (journal-specific) citation style developed by individual journals.
“more than two thirds of the journals (80.4%, 68) used an ad hoc (journal-specific) citation style developed by individual journals”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The type of source document that contained errors most frequently was online references, with an error rate of 61.3%.
“The type of source document that contained errors most frequently was online references, with an error rate of 61.3%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Deviations from standard citation styles constitute citation errors.
- Findingown data
A total of 66,922 errors were found in the references and in-text citations.
“I found a total of 66,922 errors in the references and in-text citations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The error rate for bibliographic elements such as journal title, volume or issue, and page number was 16.2% (4,424).
“The error rate for bibliographic elements such as journal title, volume or issue, and page number was 16.2% (4,424).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Inconsistencies in the number of authors cited for sources with multiple authors accounted for 12.0% (4,753) of errors.
“Inconsistencies in the number of authors cited for sources with multiple authors accounted for 12.0% (4,753) of errors”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among online reference errors, 13,342 (48.8%) were inconsistencies in the text around the URL.
“that the text around the URL is inconsistent (13,342, 48.8%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The error rate for article titles was 5.6% (1,530).
“Despite the low error rate for article titles (5.6%, 1,530)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In about 90% of the journals in the sample, the references did not fully follow the format rules provided in any standard set of guidelines such as APA, MLA, Harvard, or Vancouver.
“In about 90% of the journals in my sample, the references did not fully follow the format rules provided in any of a standard set of guidelines such as the American Psychological Association (APA), the Modern Language Association, Harvard referencing system or Vancouver citation style.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Deviations from standard citation styles constitute citation errors.
- Findingown data
The mean number of cited references per article was 25.
“The mean number of cited references per article was 25.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the sample, the rate of inconsistency in authors' names and initials between references and in-text citations was 38.0% (15,051 errors).
“In my sample, the rate of this error was 38.0% (15,051 errors).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
4,369 in-text citations were not mentioned in the references (4%).
“I found 4,369 in-text citations that were not mentioned in the references (4%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Errors in bibliographic elements provided mis-citations that may be perpetuated in later papers and in abstracting and indexing services and citation databases.
“Errors of this type provided mis-citations that may be perpetuated in later papers as well as abstracting and indexing services and citation databases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Iranian authors are likely to have more errors when they have to format for journals using non-standard reference styles.
“Iranian authors are likely to have more errors when they have to format for journals using non-standard reference styles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The journals appeared to use an arbitrary citation style that was an awkward mixture of several citation formats.
“Instead, they appeared to use an arbitrary style that was an awkward mixture of several citation formats.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
- May combine two claims. 10
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationScience Citation Index Expanded and SciFinder corrected 46% and 16% of author errors, respectively, when they index them.
“Buchanan (2006) showed that indexes such as Science Citation Index Expanded and SciFinder corrected 46% and 16% of author errors, respectively, when they index them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Buchanan, 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationInaccurate references affect the intellectual impact of scientists, journals and disciplines and may hinder individual development.
“Thus, inaccurate references affect the intellectual impact of scientists, journals and disciplines and may hinder individual development”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Meho & Rogers, 2008 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 97 journals in the final sample published 2,980 articles during 2012, with 74,577 cited references and 108,151 in-text citations.
“The 97 journals in the final sample published a total of 2,980 articles during 2012 with 74,577 cited references and 108,151 in-text citations (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNLM/ICMJE (Vancouver) style was used by 9.3% (eight) of journals, APA style by 6.2% (five), and Harvard style by 4.1% (three).
“NLM/ICMJE (Vancouver) style was used by 9.3% (eight), APA style by 6.2% (five) and Harvard style by 4.1% (three).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
FindingcitationDespite careful peer-review processes, errors of all kinds creep into the journals.
“Ultimately, my findings show that despite careful peer-review processes, 'errors of all kinds creep into the journals' (Garfield, 1990)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Garfield, 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The sample of 97 journals is representative of the 519 accredited Iranian peer-reviewed journals.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe largest percentage of errors occurred in the humanities and arts (33,104 errors, 49.5%), followed by medical sciences (13,104, 19.6%), agriculture and veterinary (8,990, 13.4%), engineering (8,276, 12.4%), and basic sciences (3,448, 5.1%).
“Frequency counts of the errors showed that the largest percentage of errors occurred in the humanities and arts (33,104 errors, 49.5%) followed in decreasing order by medical sciences (13,104, 19.6%), agriculture and veterinary (8,990, 13.4%), engineering (8,276, 12.4%), and basic sciences (3,448, 5.1%) (Fig. 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAbsence of an in-text citation of a reference, or vice versa, occurred 3,486 times and comprised 8.8% of all in-text citation errors.
“These errors occurred 3,486 times and comprised 8.8% of all in-text citation errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWeb of Science contained 0.3% incorrect citation, PsycINFO 1.1% and Google Scholar 16.5%.
“García-Pérez showed that Web of Science contained 0.3% incorrect citation, PsycINFO 1.1% and Google Scholar 16.5%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites García-Pérez
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningThis study is the first to survey reference accuracy in Iranian peer-reviewed journals across all subject disciplines.
“This study is the first to survey reference accuracy in Iranian peer-reviewed journals across all subject disciplines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMany of the journals analysed did not follow standard reference or citation styles, and one consequence was the appearance of types of errors not commonly seen in other international studies.
“Many of the journals I analysed did not follow standard reference or citation styles, and one of the consequences of this was the appearance of types of errors not commonly seen in other international studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningStratified sampling was used for the five main categories of journals to obtain a sample of 97 peer-reviewed journals.
“I then used stratified sampling for the five main categories of journals to obtain a sample of 97 peer-reviewed journals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The sample of 97 journals is representative of the 519 accredited Iranian peer-reviewed journals.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of instructions, guidelines or advice for authors in peer-reviewed journals reflects the editor's failure, at least in Iran, to devote enough attention to his or her responsibilities.
“The lack of instructions, guidelines or advice for authors in peerreviewed journals reflects the editor's failure, at least in Iran, to devote enough attention to his or her responsibilities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStudies have shown that reference and citation errors are often neglected in different specialty journals.
“Studies have shown that reference and citation errors are often neglected in different specialty journals”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningInaccuracies in references and citations fail researchers as they prevent them from being able to identify and trace the genealogy of knowledge.
“Thus, inaccuracies in references and citations fail researchers as they prevent them from being able to identify and trace the genealogy of knowledge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe higher the impact factor for the journal, the lower the number of errors.
“An interesting study by Fenton, Brazier, De Souza, Hughes, and McShane (2000) showed that 'the higher the impact factor for the journal, the lower the number of errors'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fenton et al., 2000 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe incidence rate of citation errors in the analysed articles (5.6% to 61.3%) is consistent with the results of other surveys in the Introduction.
“In the articles I analysed, the incidence rate of citation errors varied between 5.6% and 61.3%, which is consistent with the results of other surveys in the Introduction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationown dataMany journal editors pay little attention to authors' noncompliance with journal-specific format and style rules.
“Apparently, many journal editors pay little attention to authors' noncompliance with journal-specific format and style rules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe arbitrary style was the reason for the most frequent in-text citation errors listed in Table 3.
“I suggest that this arbitrary style was the reason for the most frequent in-text citation errors listed in Table 3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe journals studied were all accredited by the Commission.
“The journals I studied were all accredited by the Commission.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIncorrect or incomplete URLs are a major problem because they impede readers' access to original documents and undermine citing authors' credibility.
“The former is a major problem because it not only impedes the readers' access to the original documents but also undermines the citing authors' credibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe potential cause for mismatches between in-text citations and references is that the original source is cited in another source (indirect citation) that was not read by the citing author.
“The potential cause for these mismatches is that the original source is cited in another source (indirect citation) that was not read by the citing author.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFailure to cite colleagues correctly (or even not to cite them) causes them to be 'excluded from the fellowship of their peers'.
“Failure to cite colleagues correctly (or even not to cite them) causes them to be 'excluded from the fellowship of their peers' (The National Academies Press, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites The National Academies Press, 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe references were checked against publications in the Iran Journal Database, and if not there, other online search tools were used to find the original article.
“The references were first checked against publications in the Iran Journal Database, and if not there, then other online search tools were used to find the original article.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Iran Journal Database comprises all Iranian peer-reviewed journals.
- Rests on an assumption: The Iran Journal Database is accurate for checking references.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe result of editors' failure may be a proliferation of mistakes in submitted manuscripts.
“and the result may be a proliferation of mistakes in submitted manuscripts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe findings suggest a lack of awareness by authors of their responsibility in ensuring accurate citation.
“and suggest a lack of awareness by authors of their responsibility in ensuring accurate citation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The Iran Journal Database comprises all Iranian peer-reviewed journals.
“The Iran Journal database (http://en.ricesr.ac.ir) comprises all Iranian peer-reviewed journals and was used as the data source.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sample of 97 journals is representative of the 519 accredited Iranian peer-reviewed journals.
“I then used stratified sampling for the five main categories of journals to obtain a sample of 97 peer-reviewed journals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Deviations from standard citation styles constitute citation errors.
“In about 90% of the journals in my sample, the references did not fully follow the format rules provided in any of a standard set of guidelines such as the American Psychological Association (APA), the Modern Language Association, Harvard referencing system or Vancouver citation style.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 2012–2013 journal issues are representative of the current accuracy of Iranian peer-reviewed journals.
“The journal issues included in the sample were published between 2012 and 2013.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Commission's accreditation criteria support high editorial standards.
“Despite the criteria (such as journal scope and coverage, Editorial Board, Editor-in-Chief and Managing Editor characteristics, timeliness of publication, peer-review process, style guides, copy editing, authorship and journal website) used by the Iranian Commission on Journal Accreditation to support high editorial standards”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Iran Journal Database is accurate for checking references.
“The references were first checked against publications in the Iran Journal Database, and if not there, then other online search tools were used to find the original article.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Ghane (2016), 36.6% of verified references in 97 Iranian-accredited journals contained at least one error.
“Unclear 36.6%N/A Author”
From Reference accuracy of primary studies published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals: A scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as Ghane (2016)
The Results report a 36.6% mean percentage error rate across articles in a sample of 97 journals. Table 2 lists 74,577 checked references and 27,313 reference errors, but it does not establish that 36.6% of individual references each contained at least one error. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Unmatched-citation error count conflicts with the reported tally
MajorThe discussion counts 3,486 instances of a missing match in either direction, fewer than the 4,369 in-text citations alone that it earlier says were missing from reference lists.
“These errors occurred 3,486 times and comprised 8.8% of all in-text citation errors.”
“I found 4,369 in-text citations that were not mentioned in the references (4%) and 8,683 cited references that did not match any in-text citations (11.6%).”
Errors per article are understated
MajorThe reported 66,922 errors across 2,980 articles amount to about 22.46 errors per article, not 2.7.
Reported 2.7 · recomputed 22.457047
“I found a total of 66,922 errors in the references and in-text citations.The mean percentage error rate across articles was 36.6% (range 5.6% to 61.3%).The mean number of errors for all cited references and in-text citation was 2.7 per article.”
Two different percentages are given for ad hoc styles
MajorThe key points say 84.4% of journals used an ad hoc format, whereas the discussion gives 80.4% for that finding.
“84.4% of the journals used an ad hoc format.”
“more than two thirds of the journals (80.4%, 68) used an ad hoc (journal-specific) citation style”
Ad hoc style count does not match its percentage
MinorOf the 97 journals studied, 68 represent about 70.1%, not 80.4%.
Reported 80.4 · recomputed 70.103093
“more than two thirds of the journals (80.4%, 68) used an ad hoc (journal-specific) citation style”
Cites
Fishman (2006) · doi:10.1097/01 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals?
de Lacey, G., Record, C., & Wade, J. (1985) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.291.6499.884 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Eichorn, P., & Yankauer, A. (1987) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.77.8.1011 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
García‐Pérez, M. A. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21372 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Reference Management Software: a Comparative Analysis of Four Products.
Gilmour, R., & Cobus-Kuo, L. (2011) · Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship · doi:10.29173/istl1521 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
The accuracy of citation and quotation in otolaryngology/head and neck surgery journals
Fenton, J. E., Brazier, H., Souza, A., Hughes, J. P., & McShane, D. P. (2000) · Clinical Otolaryngology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2273.2000.00322.x · Cited by 94 · see citing works
The Ombudsman: Verification of Citations: Fawlty Towers of Knowledge?
Wright, M., & Armstrong, J. S. (2008) · INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics · doi:10.1287/inte.1070.0317 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Professionalism and Medicineʼs Social Contract*
Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R., & Johnston, S. (2000) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-200008000-00016 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Reference Management Software: a Comparative Analysis of Four Products
Gilmour, R. (2011) · Digital Collections - Ithaca College Library (Ithaca College) · doi:10.5062/f4z60kzf · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Accuracy of Cited References: The Role of Citation Databases
Buchanan, R. A. (2006) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.67.4.292 · Cited by 66 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Buchanan (2006) showed that indexes such as Science Citation Index Expanded and SciFinder corrected 46% and 16% of author errors, respectively, when they index them.”
BackgroundAccuracy of References in Five Biomedical Informatics Journals
Aronsky, D. (2004) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1683 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Referencing and quotation accuracy in four manual therapy journals
Gosling, C. M., Cameron, M., & Gibbons, P. F. (2004) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00056-0 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Citation and quotation accuracy in three anatomy journals
Lukić, I. K., Lukić, A., Glunc̆ić, V., Katavić, V., Vuc̆enik, V., & Marus̆ić, A. (2004) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.10255 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Reference accuracy in peer-reviewed pediatric orthopaedic literature
Davids, J. R., Weigl, D. M., Edmonds, J. P., & Blackhurst, D. W. (2010) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/jbjs.i.00063 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Quotation and Reference Accuracy of Three Nursing Journals
Schulmeister, L. (1998) · Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01269.x · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Accuracy of citation and quotation in foot and ankle surgery journals
Luo, M., Li, C. C., Molina, D., Andersen, C. R., & Panchbhavi, V. K. (2013) · Foot & Ankle International · doi:10.1177/1071100713475354 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Get the cite right: Design and evaluation of a high-quality online citation tutorial
Mages, W. K., & Garson, D. S. (2010) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2009.10.004 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
The accuracy of references in paediatric journals
Vargas-Origel, A. (2001) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.85.6.497 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The appropriate use of references in a scientific research paper
Taylor, D. M. (2002) · Emergency Medicine Australasia · doi:10.1046/j.1442-2026.2002.00312.x · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Accuracy of references and quotations in veterinary journals
Hinchcliff, K. W., Bruce, N. J., Powers, J. D., & Kipp, M. L. (1993) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.1993.202.03.397 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
A review of the accuracy of references in the journal Emergency Medicine
O’Connor, A. E. (2002) · Emergency Medicine Australasia · doi:10.1046/j.1442-2026.2002.00307.x · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Citation accuracy in environmental science journals
Lopresti, R. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0293-6 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Incorrect citations: a comparison of library literature with medical literature.
Benning, S., & Speer, S. C. (1993) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Tackling student referencing errors through an online tutorial
Kendall, M. (2005) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/00012530510589100 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
The citation impact outside references — formal versus informal citations
Marx, W., & Cardona, M. (2009) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-008-1824-2 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Reference accuracy in library and information science journals
Davies, K. S. (2012) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/00012531211244734 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Drake, D. C., Maritz, B., Jacobs, S. M., Crous, C. J., Engelbrecht, A., Etale, A., Fourie, M. J., Furniss, D. G., Scott, S. L., Parusnath, S., et al. (2013) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1392-6 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
COWELL, H. R. (1998) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199802000-00001 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
O'Connor, A. E., Lukin, W., Eriksson, L., & O'Connor, C. (2013) · Emergency Medicine Australasia · doi:10.1111/1742-6723.12030 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Accuracy of references in the ophthalmic literature
Oren, G. A., & Watson, M. M. (2009) · Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA · doi:10.3163/1536-5050.97.2.014 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Meho, L. I., & Rogers, Y. (2008) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0803.1716 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
A guide to reducing citation errors in bibliographies
Ghai, B., Saxena, A. K., & Makkar, J. K. (2007) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emj.2006.044206 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Writing for Publication: Avoiding Common Ethical Pitfalls
Siedlecki, S. L., Montague, M., & Schultz, J. (2008) · Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing · doi:10.1097/01.won.0000313636.83881.22 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zalcberg, D., & Ben‐Menachem, E. (2012) · European Journal of Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/eja.0b013e32835aa527 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A Method to Reduce Citation Errors While Compiling Bibliographies
Parashar, A., Makkar, S. S., Sharma, R. K., & Nanda, V. (2007) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/sap.0b013e318070da16 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sometimes The Old is Still Gold
Jafari, S. M. (2009) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.001 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Perrott, D. H. (2009) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.01.004 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Accuracy of references ‐ the responsibility of authors
Tavernor, D. (1993) · Journal of Small Animal Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1748-5827.1993.tb03891.x · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Errors in citations in foreign languages
Strauss, H. S. (1993) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81722-6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Significant Medication Error Citations Without An Observed Medication Pass
Senft, D. J. (2007) · Geriatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2006.11.001 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Njeh, C. F. (2011) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.051 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Barbero (2014) · doi:10.1016/j · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Citation quality and knowledge creation in tourism
Moyle, B., Weaver, D. B., & McLennan, C.-L. (2021) · Tourism Recreation Research · doi:10.1080/02508281.2020.1862980 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“However, resultant pressure to ‘publish or perish’ disincentivises cautiously pursued research that accurately cites all text (Ghane, 2016).”
BackgroundLogan, S. W., Hussong-Christian, U., Case, L., & Noregaard, S. (2024) · Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.1177/09610006231177715 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Citation Accuracy in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals indexed in the Web of Science
Khodabakhshi, N., Shekofteh, M., Kazerani, M., & Jambarsang, S. (2021) · DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology · doi:10.14429/djlit.41.5.16620 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
al., C. E. A. C. E., & TJPRC (2017) · International Journal of Library Science and Research · doi:10.24247/ijlsroct20173
- Authors
- Ghane, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Regional Information Center for Science and Technology (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Ghane, Mohammad Reza
- ORCID
- Ghane, Mohammad Reza
- Venue
- Learned Publishing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-01-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 77-82
- ISSN
- 0953-1513 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-4857
- OpenAlex
- W2308651494
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Learned Publishing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- cited references, in-text citations, citation errors, peer-reviewed journals, Iranian journals, journal accreditation, citation indexes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review