C‐sanitized: A privacy model for document redaction and sanitization
Open accessAbstract
Vast amounts of information are daily exchanged and/or released. The sensitive nature of much of this information creates a serious privacy threat when documents are uncontrollably made available to untrusted third parties. In such cases, appropriate data protection measures should be undertaken by the responsible organization, especially under the umbrella of current legislation on data privacy. To do so, human experts are usually requested to redact or sanitize document contents. To relieve this burdensome task, this paper presents a privacy model for document redaction/sanitization, which offers several advantages over other models available in the literature. Based on the well‐established foundations of data semantics and information theory, our model provides a framework to develop and implement automated and inherently semantic redaction/sanitization tools. Moreover, contrary to ad‐hoc redaction methods, our proposal provides a priori privacy guarantees which can be intuitively defined according to current legislations on data privacy. Empirical tests performed within the context of several use cases illustrate the applicability of our model and its ability to mimic the reasoning of human sanitizers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
<i>L</i> -diversity: Privacy beyond <i>k</i> -anonymity
Machanavajjhala, A., Kifer, D., Gehrke, J., & Venkitasubramaniam, M. (2007) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/1217299.1217302 · Cited by 3,617 · see citing works
t-Closeness: Privacy Beyond k-Anonymity and l-Diversity
Li, N., Li, T., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2007) · 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/icde.2007.367856 · Cited by 3,451 · see citing works
Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments
Fung, B. C. M., Wang, K., Chen, R., & Yu, P. S. (2010) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1749603.1749605 · Cited by 1,704 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anonymisation Models for Text Data: State of the art, Challenges and Future Directions
Lison, P., Pilán, I., Sanchez, D., Batet, M., & Øvrelid, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.323 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationDigital forgetting in large language models: a survey of unlearning methods
Blanco-Justicia, A., Jebreel, N., Manzanares-Salor, B., Sánchez, D., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Collell, G., & Eeik Tan, K. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-11078-6 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“More more sophisticated approaches assess the sensitiveness of terms by leveraging the information theory (Sánchez and Batet 2016, 2017), or the semantics embedded in language models (Hassan et al 2019, 2023).”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Sánchez, D., & Batet, M.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-04-02
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 148-163
- ISSN
- 2330-1635 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-1643
- OpenAlex
- W1690606251
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Rovira & Virgili repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Repositori institucional URV (Universitat Rovira i Virgili) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Spanish Government
- Government of Catalonia (2014 SGR 537)
- Templeton World Charity Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
- Keywords
- redaction, privacy models, data privacy legislation, privacy guarantees, data semantics, information theory, sensitive data protection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review