Cited by 80Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionAccess Control and Trust

C‐sanitized: A privacy model for document redaction and sanitization

Open access
Sánchez, David, Batet, Montserrat·2016·Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Abstract

Vast amounts of information are daily exchanged and/or released. The sensitive nature of much of this information creates a serious privacy threat when documents are uncontrollably made available to untrusted third parties. In such cases, appropriate data protection measures should be undertaken by the responsible organization, especially under the umbrella of current legislation on data privacy. To do so, human experts are usually requested to redact or sanitize document contents. To relieve this burdensome task, this paper presents a privacy model for document redaction/sanitization, which offers several advantages over other models available in the literature. Based on the well‐established foundations of data semantics and information theory, our model provides a framework to develop and implement automated and inherently semantic redaction/sanitization tools. Moreover, contrary to ad‐hoc redaction methods, our proposal provides a priori privacy guarantees which can be intuitively defined according to current legislations on data privacy. Empirical tests performed within the context of several use cases illustrate the applicability of our model and its ability to mimic the reasoning of human sanitizers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/asi.23363

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sánchez, D., & Batet, M.
Affiliations
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Venue
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-02
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
148-163
ISSN
  • 2330-1635 (ISSN-L)
  • 2330-1643
OpenAlex
W1690606251
Cited by
80
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rovira & Virgili repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Repositori institucional URV (Universitat Rovira i Virgili) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Spanish Government
  • Government of Catalonia (2014 SGR 537)
  • Templeton World Charity Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
Keywords
redaction, privacy models, data privacy legislation, privacy guarantees, data semantics, information theory, sensitive data protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review