Cited by 1,704Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionCloud Data Security Solutions

Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments

Open access
Fung, Benjamin C. M., Wang, Ke, Chen, Rui, Yu, Philip S.·2010·ACM Computing Surveys

Abstract

The collection of digital information by governments, corporations, and individuals has created tremendous opportunities for knowledge- and information-based decision making. Driven by mutual benefits, or by regulations that require certain data to be published, there is a demand for the exchange and publication of data among various parties. Data in its original form, however, typically contains sensitive information about individuals, and publishing such data will violate individual privacy. The current practice in data publishing relies mainly on policies and guidelines as to what types of data can be published and on agreements on the use of published data. This approach alone may lead to excessive data distortion or insufficient protection. Privacy-preserving data publishing (PPDP) provides methods and tools for publishing useful information while preserving data privacy. Recently, PPDP has received considerable attention in research communities, and many approaches have been proposed for different data publishing scenarios. In this survey, we will systematically summarize and evaluate different approaches to PPDP, study the challenges in practical data publishing, clarify the differences and requirements that distinguish PPDP from other related problems, and propose future research directions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1749603.1749605

Cites

154 of 154 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensitive data disclosure is a long-standing challenge in protecting anonymity when data is published and/or analysed.

    “In particular, sensitive data disclosure is a long-standing challenge in protecting anonymity when data is published and/or analysed [6,111,195].”

    From Fairness in machine learning: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [111]

  • Much of the literature assumes a priori knowledge of the set of quasi-identifiers, or seeks to discover them on a case-by-case basis.

    “Yet, for correlated or otherwise related variables (often referred to as proxies or quasiidentiiers), much of the literature assumes a priori knowledge of the set of quasi-identiiers [111], or seeks to discover them on a case-by-case basis (e.g.[150,217]) towards the idea of privacy preserving data mining [6].”

    From Fairness in machine learning: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [111]

  • There is a tension between advancing the fairness state of the art, privacy, and policy.

    “There is a tension here between advancing the fairness state of the art, privacy [111,268], and policy.”

    From Fairness in machine learning: A survey (2024) · cites this paper as [111]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 156 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.5555/1083592.1083696 · DOI
  2. Chawla S., Proceedings of the Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence Coference (UAI).
  3. Dalenius T., 1986, Finding a needle in a haystack - or identifying anonymous census record, J. Official Statistics, 2, 329
  4. Dalenius T., 1977, Towards a methodology for statistical disclosure control, Statistik Tidskrift, 15, 429
  5. 10.5555/1791834.1791836 · DOI
  6. Dwork C., Proceedings of the 24th International Cryptology Conference (CRYPTO). 528--544
  7. Fuller W. A., 1993, Masking procedures for microdata disclosure limitation, Official Statistics, 9, 383
  8. Fung B. C. M., Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI). 46--51
  9. Hundepool A., Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar on Statistical Confidentiality.
  10. Jajodia S. and Meadows C. 1995. Inference problems in multilevel database management systems. In IEEE Information Security: An Integrated Collection of Essays. 570--584. Jajodia S. and Meadows C. 1995. Inference problems in multilevel database management systems. In IEEE Information Security: An Integrated Collection of Essays. 570--584.
  11. Kim J., Proceedings of the ASA Section on Survey Research Methods. 114--119
  12. Li N., Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE).
  13. Martin D., Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE).
  14. Motwani R., Proceedings of the Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB).
  15. Nergiz M. E., Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). 1417--1421
  16. Papadimitriou S., Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), 459--470
  17. Rastogi V., Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB). 531--542
  18. 10.5555/646115.679937 · DOI
  19. Wang K., Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM).
  20. Wong R. C. W., Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB). 543--554
  21. Xiao X., Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB).
  22. Yao C., Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB). 910--921
  23. Zhang Q., Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fung, B. C. M., Wang, K., Chen, R., & Yu, P. S.
Affiliations
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
ACM Computing Surveys
Published
2010-06
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
1-53
ISSN
  • 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7341
OpenAlex
W2142406320
Cited by
1,704
References
156
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 129 · 2016: 155 · 2015: 145 · 2014: 172 · 2013: 123 · 2012: 98
FWCI
116.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion)
  • Summit (Simon Fraser University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship@McGill (McGill) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (356065-2008)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
privacy-preserving data publishing, data privacy, sensitive data, data publication, data distortion, data exchange, data protection, privacy-preserving data mining

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review