Cited by 40Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationResearch Data Management Practices

Data work in context: Value, risks, and governance

Open access
Foster, Jonathan, McLeod, Julie, Nolin, Jan, Greifeneder, Elke·2018·Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Abstract

While always integral to scientific activity, data work has recently emerged as a key set of processes within societal activities of all kinds. While data work presents new opportunities for discovery, value creation, and decision making, its emergence also raises significant ethical issues, including those of ownership, privacy, and trust. This article presents a review of data work, and how negotiating a trade‐off between its value and risks requires locating its processes within the contexts of its conditions and consequences. These include international, national, and sectoral conditions of law, policy, and regulation at a macro level; organizational conditions of information and data governance that aim to address the value and risks of data work at a meso level; along with attention to the everyday contexts of data and information handling by data information and other professionals at a micro level. In conclusion, a conceptual framework is presented that locates the processes of data work within the matrix of its macro meso and micro conditions, its consequences for individuals, organizations, and society, and the relations between them. Suggestions are given for how research into the study of data work—its value risks and governance— can be advanced by using this framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/asi.24105

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data governance is important for creating value and moderating risk in data science initiatives.

    “Data governance is important for creating value and moderating risk in data science initiatives (Foster et al. 2018)”

    From Trusted Decision-Making: Data Governance for Creating Trust in Data Science Decision Outcomes (2020) · cites this paper as Foster et al. 2018

    The 'Data work at a meso level' section says information and data governance initiatives address the balance between the value and risks of data work, and 'Data governance: value and accountability' links governance to realizing value from data. The Introduction says the review primarily considers data work outside the immediate domain of science, so it does not specifically establish the claim for data science initiatives. Page numbers were not provided in our copy's passages. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [5]5. Bygrave, L. A. (2002). The technologisation of copyright: Implications for privacy and related interests. European Intellectual Property Review, 24(2), 51-57.
  2. [28]28. Gillespie, T. (2007). Wired shut. Boston MA: MIT Press.
  3. [45]45. Kooper, M.N., Maes, R., & Roos Lindgreen, E.E.O. (2011). On the governance of information: Introducing a new concept of governance to support the management of information. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 195-200.
  4. [59]59. Misnevs, B. and Yatskiv, I. (2016). Data science: Professional requirements and competence evaluation. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4(3), 441-453.
  5. [63]63. Onions, C.T. (1973). The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles, Volume 1: A -Markworthy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  6. [80]80. Solove, D. J. (2007). 'I've got nothing to hide' and other misunderstandings of privacy. San Diego Law Review, 44, 745. Available from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=998565

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foster, J., McLeod, J., Nolin, J., & Greifeneder, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
  • University of Borås (SE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Foster, Jonathan
Venue
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-19
Volume
69
Issue
12
Pages
1414-1427
ISSN
  • 2330-1635 (ISSN-L)
  • 2330-1643
OpenAlex
W2884324956
Cited by
40
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
data work, data governance, data ethics, data ownership, privacy, trust, data regulation, information governance, conceptual framework, data professionals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review