The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Numerical Astrophysics
Abstract
E119 3D Simulations of Weakly Magnetized Accretion Disks E147 The MRI in stratified accretion discs E212 Comparison between observed and simulated globular clusters E219 Presentation of simulation results of our 3D PIC Code E244 MAGMA: A 3D Lagrangian hydrodynamics code E254 FEARLESS – A new modelling approach for turbulent astrophysical flows E256 Cosmic ray transport in MHD turbulence: Numerical calculation of Dμμ (μ) and Dμμ (p) E261 FEARLESS modeling of turbulent flows applied to numerical simulations of galaxy clusters E264 FEARLESS – Subgrid Scale Turbulence modeling and Applications to Star Formation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nucleosynthesis, neutrino bursts and γ-rays from coalescing neutron stars
Eichler, D., Livio, M., Piran, T., & Schramm, D. N. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/340126a0 · Cited by 2,107
Dynamics of black hole apparent horizons
Anninos, P., Bernstein, D., Brandt, S. R., Hobill, D., Seidel, E., & Smarr, L. (1994) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.3801 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Klingenberg, C.
- Venue
- Astronomische Nachrichten
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08-20
- Volume
- 328
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 661-664
- ISSN
- 0004-6337 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3994
- OpenAlex
- W4250322593
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Numerical Astrophysics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/asna.200740005
- The paper
- Klingenberg, C. (2007). Numerical Astrophysics. Astronomische Nachrichten. https://doi.org/10.1002/asna.200740005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
