Cited by 9scientometrics and bibliometrics researchInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Mapping Collaboration Networks in the World of Autism Research

Goldstein, Neal D., Tager‐Flusberg, Helen, Lee, Brian K.·2015·Autism Research

Abstract

In the era of globalization and with the emergence of autism spectrum disorder as a global concern, the landscape of autism research has expanded to encompass much of the world. Here, we seek to provide an overview of the world of autism research, by documenting collaboration underlying the I nternational M eeting for A utism R esearch (IMFAR), the pre‐eminent annual scientific meeting devoted to the presentation of the latest autism research. We analyzed published abstracts presented at IMFAR meetings, between 2008 and 2013, to determine patterns of collaboration. We described collaboration networks on the individual, institutional, and international levels, and visually depicted these results on spatial network maps. Consistent with findings from other scientific disciplines, we found that collaboration is correlated with research productivity. Collaborative hotspots of autism research throughout the years were clustered on the E ast and W est coasts of the U.S., C anada, and northern E urope. In years when conferences were held outside of N orth A merica, the proportion of abstracts from E urope and A sia increased. While IMFAR has traditionally been dominated by a large N orth A merican presence, greater global representation may be attained by shifting meeting locations to other regions of the world. Autism Res 2015, 8: 1–8. © 2014 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.1393

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While autism science has a strong record of collaborative efforts between academics, including autistic researchers and lay members of the autistic community in these collaborations is still a rare occurrence.

    “while autism science has a strong record of collaborative efforts between academics (Goldstein, Tager‐Flusberg, & Lee, 2015), including autistic researchers and lay members of the autistic community in these collaborations is still a rare occurrence.”

    From Annual Research Review: Shifting from ‘normal science’ to neurodiversity in autism science (2022) · cites this paper as Goldstein, Tager‐Flusberg, & Lee, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldstein, N. D., Tager‐Flusberg, H., & Lee, B. K.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Boston University Boston Massachusetts
Corresponding author
Lee, Brian K.
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-21
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W1495399587
Cited by
9
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, research collaboration networks, research productivity, international research collaboration, conference location
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Cooperative Behavior, Humans, Research, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review