Look who's talking!” Gaze Patterns for Implicit and Explicit Audio-Visual Speech Synchrony Detection in Children With High-Functioning Autism
Open accessAbstract
Conversation requires integration of information from faces and voices to fully understand the speaker's message. To detect auditory-visual asynchrony of speech, listeners must integrate visual movements of the face, particularly the mouth, with auditory speech information. Individuals with autism spectrum disorder may be less successful at such multisensory integration, despite their demonstrated preference for looking at the mouth region of a speaker. We showed participants (individuals with and without high-functioning autism (HFA) aged 8-19) a split-screen video of two identical individuals speaking side by side. Only one of the speakers was in synchrony with the corresponding audio track and synchrony switched between the two speakers every few seconds. Participants were asked to watch the video without further instructions (implicit condition) or to specifically watch the in-synch speaker (explicit condition). We recorded which part of the screen and face their eyes targeted. Both groups looked at the in-synch video significantly more with explicit instructions. However, participants with HFA looked at the in-synch video less than typically developing (TD) peers and did not increase their gaze time as much as TD participants in the explicit task. Importantly, the HFA group looked significantly less at the mouth than their TD peers, and significantly more at non-face regions of the image. There were no between-group differences for eye-directed gaze. Overall, individuals with HFA spend less time looking at the crucially important mouth region of the face during auditory-visual speech integration, which is maladaptive gaze behavior for this type of task.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With speech stimuli, all but one study find multisensory temporal processing differences in autism spectrum disorder.
“All studies save one (Grossman et al., 2009) agree that multisensory temporal processing differences are seen with speech stimuli (Bebko et al., 2006; de Boer-Schellekens et al., 2013; Grossman et al., 2015; Stevenson et al., 2014c; Woynaroski et al., 2013).”
From Behavioral, Perceptual, and Neural Alterations in Sensory and Multisensory Function in Autism Spectrum Disorder (2015) · cites this paper as Grossman et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 44
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Grossman RB Smith A Steinhart E Mitchell T 2012 Visual scanning of facial expression with high and low intensity Poster presented at Gatlinburg Conference Annapolis, MD
- Iarocci G McDonald J 2006b Sensory Integration and the Perceptual Experience of Persons with Autism. [Article] Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders 36 1 77 90 10.1007/s10803-005-0044-3 16395537 · DOI · Paper page
- Vatikiotis-Bateson E Eigsti IM Yano S 1994 Listener eye movement behavior during audiovisual perception Proceedings of the acoustical society of Japan 94 3 679 680
- Authors
- Grossman, R. B., Steinhart, E., Mitchell, T., & McIlvane, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grossman, Ruth B.
- Venue
- Autism Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-01-24
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 307-316
- ISSN
- 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-3806
- PMC
- PMC4474762
- OpenAlex
- W1943333724
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Autism Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NIDCD (R21 DC010867-01)
- NIH Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center P30 (HDP30HD004147)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- high-functioning autism, gaze behavior, multisensory integration, children
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Auditory Perception, Autistic Disorder, Child, Eye Movements, Face, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Speech, Visual Perception, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review