Cited by 323Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchWorkplace Violence and Bullying

Prevalence of School Bullying Among Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Maïano, Christophe, Normand, Claude L., Salvas, Marie‐Claude, Moullec, Grégory, Aimé, Annie·2016·Autism Research

Abstract

The true extent of school bullying among youth with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) remains an underexplored area. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to: (a) assess the proportion of school-aged youth with ASD involved in school bullying as perpetrators, victims or both; (b) examine whether the observed prevalence estimates vary when different sources of heterogeneity related to the participants' characteristics and to the assessment methods are considered; and (c) compare the risk of school bullying between youth with ASD and their typically developing (TD) peers. A systematic literature search was performed and 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. The resulting pooled prevalence estimate for general school bullying perpetration, victimization and both was 10%, 44%, and 16%, respectively. Pooled prevalence was also estimated for physical, verbal, and relational school victimization and was 33%, 50%, and 31%, respectively. Moreover, subgroup analyses showed significant variations in the pooled prevalence by geographic location, school setting, information source, type of measures, assessment time frame, and bullying frequency criterion. Finally, school-aged youth with ASD were found to be at greater risk of school victimization in general, as well as verbal bullying, than their TD peers. Autism Res 2016, 9: 601-615. © 2015 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.1568

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maïano, C., Normand, C. L., Salvas, M., Moullec, G., & Aimé, A.
Affiliations
Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA)
Corresponding author
Maïano, Christophe
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-10-09
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
601-615
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W1942667353
Cited by
323
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430-2012-0091, 435-2014-0909)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
school bullying, autism spectrum disorder, bullying perpetration, bullying victimization, bullying prevalence, verbal bullying, physical bullying, relational bullying, typically developing peers, school-age adolescents
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, Humans, Peer Group, Risk, United States, Prevalence, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review