Cited by 17Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersPhonetics and Phonology Research

Neural coding of formant‐exaggerated speech and nonspeech in children with and without autism spectrum disorders

Chen, Fei, Zhang, Hao, Ding, Hongwei, Wang, Suiping, Peng, Gang, Zhang, Yang·2021·Autism Research

Abstract

The presence of vowel exaggeration in infant‐directed speech (IDS) may adapt to the age‐appropriate demands in speech and language acquisition. Previous studies have provided behavioral evidence of atypical auditory processing towards IDS in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), while the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms remain unknown. This event‐related potential (ERP) study investigated the neural coding of formant‐exaggerated speech and nonspeech in 24 4‐ to 11‐year‐old children with ASD and 24 typically‐developing (TD) peers. The EEG data were recorded using an alternating block design, in which each stimulus type (exaggerated/non‐exaggerated sound) was presented with equal probability. ERP waveform analysis revealed an enhanced P1 for vowel formant exaggeration in the TD group but not in the ASD group. This speech‐specific atypical processing in ASD was not found for the nonspeech stimuli which showed similar P1 enhancement in both ASD and TD groups. Moreover, the time‐frequency analysis indicated that children with ASD showed differences in neural synchronization in the delta‐theta bands for processing acoustic formant changes embedded in nonspeech. Collectively, the results add substantiating neurophysiological evidence (i.e., a lack of neural enhancement effect of vowel exaggeration) for atypical auditory processing of IDS in children with ASD, which may exert a negative effect on phonetic encoding and language learning. Lay summary: Atypical responses to motherese might act as a potential early marker of risk for children with ASD. This study investigated the neural responses to such socially relevant stimuli in the ASD brain, and the results suggested a lack of neural enhancement responding to the motherese even in individuals without intellectual disability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.2509

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Chen, F., Zhang, H., Ding, H., Wang, S., Peng, G., & Zhang, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • South China Normal University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Yang
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-31
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
1357-1374
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W3146237240
Cited by
17
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31728009)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, infant-directed speech, child-directed speech, auditory processing, neural coding, P1 component, non-speech sounds, phonetic encoding, language acquisition, children
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Child, Preschool, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Language Development, Phonetics, Speech, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review