Cited by 4Corneal surgery and disordersAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchOcular Surface and Contact Lens

Corneal structural alterations in autism spectrum disorder: An in vivo confocal microscopy study

Chien, Yi‐Ling, Wu, Po‐Ying, Wu, Jo‐Hsuan, Huang, Wei‐Lun, Hsiao, Chia‐Chieh, Hsieh, Yi‐Ting, Cheng, Ting, Gau, Susan Shur‐Fen +1 more·2023·Autism Research

Abstract

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) often exhibit joint hypermobility and connective tissue disorders. However, it remains unclear if ASD individuals also have structural alterations in the connective tissue of the cornea. This study aims to determine whether the Kobayashi structure (K-structure) characteristics differ between adults with ASD and typically developing controls (TDC) and explore the clinical correlates of the K-structure abnormality. We recruited 30 ASD adults and 35 TDC. Corneal structures, particularly the K-structure in the Bowman's layer, of the participants were examined using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and a K-grading ranging from 1 to 4 was given to each eye based on the level of morphological mosaicism. The ASD participants' eyes received a significantly higher single-eye K-grading than that of the TDC eyes (p 6 and >3, respectively. Additionally, a higher K-grading was associated with fewer visual sensation seeking in ASD (Spearman's correlation coefficient ρ = -0.518, p = 0.008) and low visual registration (i.e., higher sensory threshold) in TDC (ρ = 0.446, p = 0.023). This study provided novel evidence of corneal structural alterations in ASD by IVCM. Our findings may not only support the prior hypothesis of the association between ASD and connective tissue abnormalities but also shed light on the relationship between connective tissue disorder and neurodevelopmental disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.3050

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chien, Y., Wu, P., Wu, J., Huang, W., Hsiao, C., Hsieh, Y., Cheng, T., Gau, S. S., & Chen, W.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
  • Gau, Susan Shur‐Fen
  • Chen, Wei‐Li
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-12
Volume
16
Issue
12
Pages
2316-2325
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W4389346333
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health Research Institutes (NHRI‐EX110‐11008PC, NHRI‐EX111‐11008PC, NHRI‐EX112‐11008PC)
  • National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH110‐S4826, NTUH108‐A144)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, corneal structure, Bowman's layer, connective tissue abnormalities, in vivo confocal microscopy, visual registration, sensory threshold, neurodevelopmental disorders
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Cornea, Humans, Research Design, Microscopy, Confocal, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review