Cited by 96Connective tissue disorders researchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Brain structure and joint hypermobility: Relevance to the expression of psychiatric symptoms

Open access
Eccles, J. A., Beacher, F. D. C., Gray, M. A., Jones, C. L., Minati, L., Harrison, N. A., Critchley, H. D.·2012·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Joint hypermobility is overrepresented among people with anxiety and can be associated with abnormal autonomic reactivity. We tested for associations between regional cerebral grey matter and hypermobility in 72 healthy volunteers using voxel-based morphometry of structural brain scans. Strikingly, bilateral amygdala volume distinguished those with from those without hypermobility. The hypermobility group scored higher for interoceptive sensitivity yet were not significantly more anxious. Our findings specifically link hypermobility to the structural integrity of a brain centre implicated in normal and abnormal emotions and physiological responses. Our observations endorse hypermobility as a multisystem phenotype and suggest potential mechanisms mediating clinical vulnerability to neuropsychiatric symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.092460

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eccles, J. A., Beacher, F. D. C., Gray, M. A., Jones, C. L., Minati, L., Harrison, N. A., & Critchley, H. D.
Affiliations
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
Corresponding author
Eccles, J. A.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2012-06
Volume
200
Issue
6
Pages
508-509
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2135195308
Cited by
96
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (074333)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2009-27-003)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K002643/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
joint hypermobility, amygdala volume, interoceptive sensitivity, anxiety, autonomic reactivity, psychiatric vulnerability, brain structure
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Anxiety Disorders, Brain Diseases, Humans, Joint Instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review