The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biomass recalcitrance. Part I: the chemical compositions and physical structures affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose
Abstract
Lignocellulosic biomass is recalcitrant to biodegradation due to the rigid and compact structure of plant cell wall. The recalcitrance of biomass is mainly constructed by its chemical compositions that build a spatial network as a protective bulwark. Generally, the factors affecting the accessibility of biomass cellulose can be divided into direct and indirect factors. The direct factors refer to the accessible surface area, and the indirect factors include biomass structure‐relevant factors (pore size and volume, particle size, and specific surface area), chemical compositions (lignin, hemicelluloses, and acetyl group), and cellulose structure‐relevant factors (cellulose crystallinity and degree of polymerization). Pre‐treatment is actually the process to alter indirect factors and improve direct factors thus enhancing the accessibility of cellulose. In this review, we summarize the effects of chemical compositions and physical structures on the enzymatic digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. We suggest that future work should be focused on but not limited to the molecular mechanisms of biomass recalcitrance by investigating the microscale and nanoscale features as well as hydrogen bonds network of lignocellulosic biomass. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
MOSIER, N. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 · Cited by 6,251
Alvira, P., Tomás-Pejó, E., Ballesteros, M., & Negro, M. J. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093 · Cited by 3,912
Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low‐cost cellulosic ethanol
Yang, B., & Wyman, C. E. (2008) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.49 · Cited by 1,524
Substrate and Enzyme Characteristics that Limit Cellulose Hydrolysis
Mansfield, S. D., Mooney, C., & Saddler, J. N. (1999) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp9900864 · Cited by 869
Cited by
A review on biomass: importance, chemistry, classification, and conversion
Tursi, A. (2019) · Biofuel Research Journal · doi:10.18331/brj2019.6.2.3 · Cited by 896
Hoang, A. T., Ong, H. C., Fattah, I. M. R., Chong, C. T., Cheng, C. K., Sakthivel, R., & Ok, Y. S. (2021) · Fuel Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106997 · Cited by 512
Organic Solvent Effects in Biomass Conversion Reactions
Shuai, L., & Luterbacher, J. (2016) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201501148 · Cited by 445
Enzymatic Degradation of Lignin in Soil: A Review
Datta, R., Kelkar, A., Baraniya, D., Molaei, A., Moulick, A., Meena, R., & Formanek, P. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9071163 · Cited by 389
Ambaye, T. G., Vaccari, M., Bonilla-Petriciolet, A., Prasad, S., van Hullebusch, E. D., & Rtimi, S. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112627 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, X., Zhang, L., & Liu, D.
- Venue
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-15
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 465-482
- ISSN
- 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-104X
- OpenAlex
- W2018315914
- Cited by
- 986
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 23.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomass recalcitrance. Part I: the chemical compositions and physical structures affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bbb.1331
- The paper
- Zhao, X., Zhang, L., & Liu, D. (2012). Biomass recalcitrance. Part I: the chemical compositions and physical structures affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1331
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.