The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A techno‐economic review of hydroprocessed renewable esters and fatty acids for jet fuel production
Abstract
Jet fuels produced from sources other than petroleum are receiving considerable attention because they offer the potential to diversify energy supplies while mitigating the net environmental impacts of aviation. The hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids (HEFA) process is a commercially deployed technology that converts vegetable oils and animal fats from triglycerides into hydrocarbons suitable for use in diesel and jet fuels. The technical means of producing alternative fuels from renewable oils, and the resulting carbon intensity has been documented in previous work. However, the cost of production is not available in the literature. This work reviews HEFA fuel production, and estimates the gate price of fuel for several plant sizes and operating conditions. Aspen Plus was used to model biorefinery material and energy balances for unit operations and supporting utilities. A discounted‐cash‐flow‐rate‐of‐return (DCFROR) economic model was used for sensitivity analysis. The gate price was found to range between $1.00 L–1 for a 378 MML yr–1 HEFA facility, and $1.16 L–1 for a 116 MML yr–1 facility. Maximizing jet fuel production ranged between $0.07 and $0.08 L–1 due to increased hydrogen use and decreased diesel and jet fuel yield. While feedstock cost is the most significant portion of fuel cost, facility size, financing, and capacity utilization also influence production costs. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Techno-economic analysis of biomass fast pyrolysis to transportation fuels
Wright, M. M., Daugaard, D. E., Satrio, J. A., & Brown, R. C. (2010) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2010.07.029 · Cited by 814
(2010) · doi:10.1021/es102597f · Cited by 98
Self-citation
Cited by
Bio-jet fuel conversion technologies
Wang, W.-C., & Tao, L. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.016 · Cited by 564
Renewable bio-jet fuel production for aviation: a review
Wei, H., Liu, W., Chen, X., Yang, Q., Li, J., & Chen, H. (2019) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.06.007 · Cited by 435
Bond, J. Q., Upadhye, A. A., Olcay, H., Tompsett, G. A., Jae, J., Xing, R., Alonso, D. M., Wang, D., Zhang, T., Kumar, R., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee43846e · Cited by 403
Shahabuddin, M., Alam, M. T., Krishna, B. B., Bhaskar, T., & Perkins, G. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123596 · Cited by 339
Aviation CO2 emissions reductions from the use of alternative jet fuels
Staples, M. D., Malina, R., Suresh, P., Hileman, J. I., & Barrett, S. R. H. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.007 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearlson, M., Wollersheim, C., & Hileman, J.
- Venue
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-96
- ISSN
- 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-104X
- OpenAlex
- W2130955375
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
