Techno-economic analysis of biomass fast pyrolysis to transportation fuels
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A techno-economic analysis based on the fast pyrolysis process indicated that the cost of biofuel could range from $0.40/gal to $3.07/gal.
“A techno-economic analysis based on the fast pyrolysis process indicated that the cost of biofuel could range from $0.40/gal to $3.07/gal 19-20 .”
From Economic and life cycle assessments of biomass utilization for bioenergy products (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
The wide geographic distribution of forest residues usually causes high costs of logistics operations such as collection, loading, transportation, unloading, and storage.
“Considering the low price of forest residues, they are considered as a potential feedstock for biochar; however, the wide geographic distribution of forest residues usually causes high costs of logistics operations, e.g., collection, loading, transportation, unloading, and storage [4,11,12].”
From Lifecycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of Biochar Pellet Production from Forest Residues and Field Application (2022) · cites this paper as [11]
The high cost of inbound and outbound logistics is one of the main obstacles to the commercialization of the biochar industry and its growth.
“The high cost of inbound (i.e., biomass) and outbound (i.e., biochar) logistics is one of the main obstacles to the commercialization of the biochar industry and its growth.”
From Lifecycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of Biochar Pellet Production from Forest Residues and Field Application (2022) · cites this paper as [11]
Cites
Jones, S. B., Valkenburg, C., Walton, C. W., Elliott, D. C., Holladay, J. E., Stevens, D. J., Kinchin, C., & Czernik, S. (2009) · doi:10.2172/949907 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Catalytic Transformation of Lignin for the Production of Chemicals and Fuels
Li, C., Zhao, X., Wang, A., Huber, G. W., & Zhang, T. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00155 · Cited by 2,951 · see citing works
Catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to fine chemicals and fuels
Zhou, C.-H., Xia, X., Lin, C.-X., Tong, D.-S., & Beltramini, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15124j · Cited by 1,420 · see citing works
Biofuels Production through Biomass Pyrolysis—A Technological Review
Jahirul, M., Rasul, M., Chowdhury, A., & Ashwath, N. (2012) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en5124952 · Cited by 1,427 · see citing works
Techno-Economic Analysis of Autotrophic Microalgae for Fuel Production
Davis, R., Aden, A., & Pienkos, P. T. (2011) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.04.018 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Bio-jet fuel conversion technologies
Wang, W.-C., & Tao, L. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.016 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
A review on catalytic pyrolysis of plastic wastes to high-value products
Peng, Y., Wang, Y., Ke, L., Dai, L., Wu, Q., Cobb, K., Zeng, Y., Zou, R., Liu, Y., & Ruan, R. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115243 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock
Kumar, M., Olajire Oyedun, A., & Kumar, A. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.270 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Patel, M., Zhang, X., & Kumar, A. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.070 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Hoang, A. T., Ong, H. C., Fattah, I. M. R., Chong, C. T., Cheng, C. K., Sakthivel, R., & Ok, Y. S. (2021) · Fuel Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2021.106997 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Prospects for pyrolysis technologies in the bioenergy sector: A review
Roy, P., & Dias, G. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.136 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Mahmud, R., Moni, S. M., High, K., & Carbajales-Dale, M. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128247 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Controlling the selectivity to chemicals from lignin via catalytic fast pyrolysis
Ma, Z., Troussard, E., & van Bokhoven, J. A. (2012) · Applied Catalysis A: General · doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2012.02.027 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
de Jong, S., Hoefnagels, R., Faaij, A., Slade, R., Mawhood, R., & Junginger, M. (2015) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1613 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Patel, M., & Kumar, A. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.146 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Critical review of the role of ash content and composition in biomass pyrolysis
Puri, L., Hu, Y., & Naterer, G. (2024) · Frontiers in Fuels · doi:10.3389/ffuel.2024.1378361 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
“…primarily affects pyrolysis with respect to i) the reaction rate; ii) bio-oil yield and properties; iii) composition of biochar; and iv) the total biomass conversion (Antal, 1983; Scott et al., 2001; Wright et al., 2010; Bridgwater, 2012; Mayer et al., 2012; Carpenter et al., 2014).”
BackgroundTzanetis, K. F., Posada, J. A., & Ramirez, A. (2017) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.104 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Atsonios, K., Kougioumtzis, M.-A., D. Panopoulos, K., & Kakaras, E. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.056 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Life cycle assessment of gasoline and diesel produced via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing
Hsu, D. D. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.05.019 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Ren, S., Lei, H., Wang, L., Bu, Q., Chen, S., & Wu, J. (2014) · RSC Adv. · doi:10.1039/c4ra00122b · Cited by 176 · see citing works
A techno-economic review of thermochemical cellulosic biofuel pathways
Brown, T. R. (2015) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.053 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Impact of feedstock quality and variation on biochemical and thermochemical conversion
Li, C., Aston, J. E., Lacey, J. A., Thompson, V. S., & Thompson, D. N. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.063 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Selective deoxygenation of lignin during catalytic fast pyrolysis
Ma, Z., Custodis, V., & van Bokhoven, J. A. (2014) · Catalysis Science & Technology · doi:10.1039/c3cy00704a · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Policy support for biochar: Review and recommendations
Pourhashem, G., Hung, S. Y., Medlock, K. B., & Masiello, C. A. (2019) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12582 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Phenols and aromatics from fast pyrolysis of variously prepared lignins from hard- and softwoods
Custodis, V. B. F., Bährle, C., Vogel, F., & van Bokhoven, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2015.07.018 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Techno-economic assessment of biorefinery technologies for aviation biofuels supply chains in Brazil
Alves, C. M., Valk, M., de Jong, S., Bonomi, A., van der Wielen, L. A. M., & Mussatto, S. I. (2017) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1711 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Hydrocarbon bio-jet fuel from bioconversion of poplar biomass: techno-economic assessment
Crawford, J. T., Shan, C. W., Budsberg, E., Morgan, H., Bura, R., & Gustafson, R. (2016) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-016-0545-7 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Mu, D., Ruan, R., Addy, M., Mack, S., Chen, P., & Zhou, Y. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.108 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Bergman, R., Sahoo, K., Englund, K., & Mousavi-Avval, S. H. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15041559 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Considering the low price of forest residues, they are considered as a potential feedstock for biochar; however, the wide geographic distribution of forest residues usually causes high costs of logistics operations, e.g., collection, loading, transportation, unloading, and storage [4,11,12].”
Economic and life cycle assessments of biomass utilization for bioenergy products
Liu, W., Wang, J., Richard, T. L., Hartley, D. S., Spatari, S., & Volk, T. A. (2017) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1770 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Bio-methane via fast pyrolysis of biomass
Görling, M., Larsson, M., & Alvfors, P. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.002 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Field to flight: A techno‐economic analysis of the corn stover to aviation biofuels supply chain
Bittner, A., Tyner, W. E., & Zhao, X. (2015) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1536 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Cui, Z., Greene, J. M., Cheng, F., Quinn, J. C., Jena, U., & Brewer, C. E. (2020) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2020.102077 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Exergoeconomic evaluation of a banana waste pyrolysis plant for biofuel production
Ayala-Ruíz, N., Malagón-Romero, D. H., & Milquez-Sanabria, H. A. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132108 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Summary of Fast Pyrolysis and Upgrading GHG Analyses
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), R., Snowden-Swan, L., USDOE, & Male, J. (2012) · doi:10.2172/1072913 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Sustainability assessment of biojet fuel produced from pyrolysis oil of woody biomass
Fitriasari, E. I., Won, W., & Jay Liu, J. (2023) · Sustainable Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1039/d3se00468f · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Zhang, Z., & Lan, K. (2022) · Journal of Renewable Materials · doi:10.32604/jrm.2022.017506 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wright, M. M., Daugaard, D. E., Satrio, J. A., & Brown, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- ConocoPhillips (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Robert C.
- Venue
- Fuel
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 89
- Pages
- S2-S10
- ISSN
- 0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092451395
- Cited by
- 814
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 23.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fuel (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Keywords
- fast pyrolysis, corn stover, bio-oil upgrading, transportation fuels, hydrogen production, diesel fuel, naphtha, biorefinery, capital costs, biofuel economics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review