The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of torrefaction for bioenergy feedstock production
Abstract
The torrefaction of biomass is a thermochemical decomposition process in which hemicellulose degradation is the dominant reaction, with the cellulose and lignin fractions largely unaffected. The primary product is a solid material that retains 75–95% of the original energy content. Properties of the torrefied solid include improved grindability, hydrophobicity, and energy density. Torrefied biomass has been processed successfully in batch‐mode and continuous process devices; net thermal efficiencies of the process as high as 90% have been reported. Torrefied biomass has been proposed as a feedstock for coal co‐combustion, as well as for gasification‐combustion and Fischer‐Tropsch fuel production. Analyses of supply chain impacts indicate that, in some scenarios, torrefaction can be the lowest cost and most energy efficient option for supplying fuel, especially when combined with pelletization of the material. Significant gaps still exist in our understanding of torrefaction; there is need to further study this important process for its potential benefits to bioenergy production. Some of the more pressing needs include characterization of chemical pathways of the torrefaction reaction, investigation of equipment performance and equipment‐related influences on the process, and elucidation of supply chain impacts. © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chen, W.-H., & Kuo, P.-C. (2010) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.054 · Cited by 603
Effect of process parameters on pelletisation of herbaceous crops
Gilbert, P., Ryu, C., Sharifi, V., & Swithenbank, J. (2009) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2009.03.015 · Cited by 259
Felfli, F. F., Luengo, C. A., Suárez, J. A., & Beatón, P. A. (2005) · Energy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1016/s0973-0826(08)60519-0 · Cited by 221
Pretreatment and feeding of biomass for pressurized entrained flow gasification
Svoboda, K., Pohořelý, M., Hartman, M., & Martinec, J. (2009) · Fuel Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.12.005 · Cited by 192
Hydrothermal Conversion of Biomass: I, Glucose Conversion in Hot Compressed Water
Knežević, D., van Swaaij, W. P. M., & Kersten, S. R. A. (2009) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie801387v · Cited by 180
Cited by
Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels: A review
van der Stelt, M. J. C., Gerhauser, H., Kiel, J. H. A., & Ptasinski, K. J. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.023 · Cited by 1,262
Upgrading biomass fuels via wet torrefaction: A review and comparison with dry torrefaction
Bach, Q.-V., & Skreiberg, Ø. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.014 · Cited by 431
Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review
Ramos, A., Monteiro, E., Silva, V., & Rouboa, A. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.025 · Cited by 367
Kostas, E. T., Beneroso, D., & Robinson, J. P. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.135 · Cited by 319
Cahyanti, M. N., Doddapaneni, T. R. K. C., & Kikas, T. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122737 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Ciolkosz, D., & Wallace, R.
- Venue
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-28
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-329
- ISSN
- 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-104X
- OpenAlex
- W2020221469
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.