The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Furfural: Hemicellulose/xylosederived biochemical
Abstract
Hemicellulose, the second, most common polysaccharide in nature constitutes approximately 20—35% of lignocellulosic biomass. Effective utilization of biomass, hitherto underutilized, is gaining tremendous importance for the production of energy, fuels, and chemicals. Amongst the vast array of chemicals derived from lignocellulosics, furfural is the key chemical that finds wide applications in oil refining, plastics, pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries. There is no synthetic route for the production of furfural. A few conventional technologies currently in practice for its separation and subsequent isolation are appropriately reviewed. Major disadvantages associated with processes currently used for the production of furfural based on acid‐catalyzed hydrolysis have been discussed. A need to develop a process which is devoid of all the shortcomings associated with conventional process is emphasized. Several important aspects of chemistry underlying the acid hydrolysis of xylose are discussed. The importance of myriad pre‐treatment steps involved to surmount the physical and chemical barriers and to liberate xylose from the confines of acid‐resistant layer of lignin has been emphasized. New developments in the production of furfural from cyclodehydration of xylose using solid acid catalysts in the recent past have been reviewed appropriately in present communication. Finally, the production of furfural and furfuryl alcohol, their domestic market and export in China deserve some coverage and therefore have appropriately been discussed as well. © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low‐cost cellulosic ethanol
Yang, B., & Wyman, C. E. (2008) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.49 · Cited by 1,524
Cited by
Catalytic conversion of biomass to biofuels
Alonso, D. M., Bond, J. Q., & Dumesic, J. A. (2010) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c004654j · Cited by 2,333
Conversion of Biomass into Chemicals over Metal Catalysts
Besson, M., Gallezot, P., & Pinel, C. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr4002269 · Cited by 1,780
Furfural: a renewable and versatile platform molecule for the synthesis of chemicals and fuels
Mariscal, R., Maireles-Torres, P., Ojeda, M., Sádaba, I., & López Granados, M. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee02666k · Cited by 1,642
Furfural—A Promising Platform for Lignocellulosic Biofuels
Lange, J., van der Heide, E., van Buijtenen, J., & Price, R. (2012) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201100648 · Cited by 1,323
Furfural: A Promising Platform Compound for Sustainable Production of C4 and C5 Chemicals
Li, X., Jia, P., & Wang, T. (2016) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b01838 · Cited by 834
Metadata
- Authors
- Mamman, A. S., Lee, J., Kim, Y., Hwang, I. T., Park, N., Hwang, Y. K., Chang, J., & Hwang, J.
- Venue
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 438-454
- ISSN
- 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-104X
- OpenAlex
- W2128601085
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.