The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zebrafish—As an integrative model for twenty‐first century toxicity testing
Abstract
The zebrafish embryo is a useful small model for investigating vertebrate development because of its transparency, low cost, transgenic and morpholino capabilities, conservation of cell signaling, and concordance with mammalian developmental phenotypes. From these advantages, the zebrafish embryo has been considered as an alternative model for traditional in vivo developmental toxicity screening. The use of this organism in conjunction with traditional in vivo developmental toxicity testing has the potential to reduce cost and increase throughput of testing the chemical universe, prioritize chemicals for targeted toxicity testing, generate predictive models of developmental toxicants, and elucidate mechanisms and adverse outcome pathways for abnormal development. This review gives an overview of the zebrafish embryo for pre dictive toxicology and 21st century toxicity testing. Developmental eye defects were selected as an example to evaluate data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast program comparing responses in zebrafish embryos with those from pregnant rats and rabbits for a subset of 24 environmental chemicals across >600 in vitro assay targets. Cross‐species comparisons implied a common basis for biological pathways associated with neuronal defects, extracellular matrix remodeling, and mitotic arrest. Birth Defects Research (Part C) 93:256–267, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Concordance of the toxicity of pharmaceuticals in humans and in animals
Olson, H., Betton, G., Robinson, D., Thomas, K., Monro, A., Kolaja, G., Lilly, P., Sanders, J., Sipes, G., Bracken, W., et al. (2000) · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1006/rtph.2000.1399 · Cited by 2,050
Cited by
Kavlock, R., Chandler, K., Houck, K., Hunter, S., Judson, R., Kleinstreuer, N., Knudsen, T., Martin, M., Padilla, S., Reif, D., et al. (2012) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx3000939 · Cited by 494
Self-citationEnfrin, M., Lee, J., Gibert, Y., Basheer, F., Kong, L., & Dumée, L. F. (2020) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121393 · Cited by 410
Wilson, E. W., Castro, V., Chaves, R., Espinosa, M., Rodil, R., Quintana, J. B., Vieira, M. N., & Santos, M. M. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129823 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Sipes, N. S., Padilla, S., & Knudsen, T. B.
- Venue
- Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 256-267
- ISSN
- 1542-975X (ISSN-L)
- 1542-9768
- OpenAlex
- W2034335846
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zebrafish—As an integrative model for twenty‐first century toxicity testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bdrc.20214
- The paper
- Sipes, N. S., Padilla, S., & Knudsen, T. B. (2011). Zebrafish—As an integrative model for twenty‐first century toxicity testing. Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrc.20214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.