The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Role for the magnetic field in the radiation‐induced efflux of calcium ions from brain tissue in vitro
Abstract
Two independent laboratories have demonstrated that electromagnetic radiation at specific frequencies can cause a change in the efflux of calcium ions from brain tissue in vitro. In a local geomagnetic field (LGF) at a density of 38 microTesla (μT), 15‐ and 45‐Hz electromagnetic signals (40 V p‐p/m in air) have been shown to induce a change in the efflux of calcium ions from the exposed tissues, whereas 1‐ and 30‐Hz signals do not. We now show that the effective 15‐Hz signal can be rendered ineffective when the LGF is reduced to 19 μT with Helmholtz coils. In addition, the ineffective 30‐Hz signal becomes effective when the LGF is changed to ±25.3 μT or to ± 76 μT. These results demonstrate that the net intensity of the LGF is an important variable. The results appear to describe a resonance‐like relationship in which the frequency of the electromagnetic field that can induce a change in efflux is proportional to a product of LGF density and an index, 2n + 1, where n = 0,1. These phenomenological findings may provide a basis for evaluating the apparent lack of reproducibility of biological effects caused by low‐intensity extremely‐low‐frequency (ELF) electromagnetic signals. In future investigations of this phenomenon, the LGF vector should be explicitly described. If the underlying mechanism involves a general property of tissue, then research conducted in the ambient electromagnetic environment (50/60 Hz) may be subjected to unnoticed and uncontrolled influences, depending on the density of the LGF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electromagnetic effects—From cell biology to medicine
Funk, R. H. W., Monsees, T., & Özkucur, N. (2009) · Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.proghi.2008.07.001 · Cited by 423
Magnetic field effects in biology from the perspective of the radical pair mechanism
Zadeh-Haghighi, H., & Simon, C. (2022) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2022.0325 · Cited by 197
Blackman, C. F., Benane, S. G., Elliott, D. J., House, D. E., & Pollock, M. M. (1988) · Bioelectromagnetics · doi:10.1002/bem.2250090303 · Cited by 152
Self-citationECG Changes in Humans Exposed to 50 Hz Magnetic Fields
Borjanovic, S. S., Jankovic, S. M., & Pejovic, Z. (2005) · Journal of Occupational Health · doi:10.1539/joh.47.391 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Blackman, C. F., Benane, S. G., Rabinowitz, J. R., House, D. E., & Joines, W. T.
- Venue
- Bioelectromagnetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 327-337
- ISSN
- 0197-8462 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-186X
- OpenAlex
- W2131702017
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Role for the magnetic field in the radiation‐induced efflux of calcium ions from brain tissue in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bem.2250060402
- The paper
- Blackman, C. F., Benane, S. G., Rabinowitz, J. R., House, D. E., & Joines, W. T. (1985). A Role for the magnetic field in the radiation‐induced efflux of calcium ions from brain tissue in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.2250060402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.