The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetite in human tissues: A mechanism for the biological effects of weak ELF magnetic fields
Abstract
Due to the apparent lack of a biophysical mechanism, the question of whether weak, low-frequency magnetic fields are able to influence living organisms has long been one of the most controversial subjects in any field of science. However, two developments during the past decade have changed this perception dramatically, the first being the discovery that many organisms, including humans, biochemically precipitate the ferrimagnetic mineral magnetite (Fe3O4). In the magnetotactic bacteria, the geomagnetic response is based on either biogenic magnetite or greigite (Fe3S4), and reasonably good evidence exists that this is also the case in higher animals such as the honey bee. Second, the development of simple behavioral conditioning experiments for training honey bees to discriminate magnetic fields demonstrates conclusively that at least one terrestrial animal is capable of detecting earth-strength magnetic fields through a sensory process. In turn, the existence of this ability implies the presence of specialized receptors which interact at the cellular level with weak magnetic fields in a fashion exceeding thermal noise. A simple calculation shows that magnetosomes moving in response to earth-strength ELF fields are capable of opening trans-membrane ion channels, in a fashion similar to those predicted by ionic resonance models. Hence, the presence of trace levels of biogenic magnetite in virtually all human tissues examined suggests that similar biophysical processes may explain a variety of weak field ELF bioeffects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Purcell, E. M. (1977) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.10903 · Cited by 4,360
Lowenstam, H. A., & Weiner, S. (1989) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195049770.001.0001 · Cited by 2,090
Cited by
Cell Uptake and in Vitro Toxicity of Magnetic Nanoparticles Suitable for Drug Delivery
Häfeli, U. O., Riffle, J. S., Harris-Shekhawat, L., Carmichael-Baranauskas, A., Mark, F., Dailey, J. P., & Bardenstein, D. (2009) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp900083m · Cited by 277
Lunar biological effects and the magnetosphere
Bevington, M. (2015) · Pathophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.pathophys.2015.08.005 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirschvink, J. L., Kobayashi-Kirschvink, A., Diaz-Ricci, J. C., & Kirschvink, S. J.
- Venue
- Bioelectromagnetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 101-113
- ISSN
- 0197-8462 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-186X
- OpenAlex
- W2145862765
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetite in human tissues: A mechanism for the biological effects of weak ELF magnetic fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bem.2250130710
- The paper
- Kirschvink, J. L., Kobayashi-Kirschvink, A., Diaz-Ricci, J. C., & Kirschvink, S. J. (1992). Magnetite in human tissues: A mechanism for the biological effects of weak ELF magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.2250130710
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.