Cited by 50Electromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsParanormal Experiences and BeliefsBiofield Effects and Biophysics

Lunar biological effects and the magnetosphere

Open access
Bevington, Michael·2015·Pathophysiology

Abstract

The debate about how far the Moon causes biological effects has continued for two millennia. Pliny the Elder argued for lunar power "penetrating all things", including plants, fish, animals and humans. He also linked the Moon with tides, confirmed mathematically by Newton. A review of modern studies of biological effects, especially from plants and animals, confirms the pervasive nature of this lunar force. However calculations from physics and other arguments refute the supposed mechanisms of gravity and light. Recent space exploration allows a new approach with evidence of electromagnetic fields associated with the Earth's magnetotail at full moon during the night, and similar, but more limited, effects from the Moon's wake on the magnetosphere at new moon during the day. The disturbance of the magnetotail is perhaps shown by measurements of electric fields of up to 16V/m compared with the usual <1V/m, suggesting the possibility of weak biological effects on some sensitive organisms. Similar intensities found in sferics, geomagnetic storms, aurora disturbance, sensations of a 'presence' and pre-seismic electromagnetic radiation are known to affect animals and 10-20% of the human population. There is now evidence for mechanisms such as calcium flux, melatonin disruption, magnetite and cryptochromes. Both environmental and receptor variations explain confounding factors and inconsistencies in the evidence. Electromagnetic effects might also account for some evolutionary changes. Further research on lunar biological effects, such as acute myocardial infarction, could help the development of strategies to reduce adverse effects for people sensitive to geomagnetic disturbance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pathophys.2015.08.005

Cites

156 of 156 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The overall gravitational pull of the moon on a single human subject is minuscule.

    “It must, however, be borne in mind that the overall gravitational pull of the moon on a single human subject is minuscule (Bevington, 2015).”

    From Sex-specific association of the lunar cycle with sleep (2022) · cites this paper as Bevington, 2015

  • The Moon affects Earth's magnetotail, thereby creating oscillating electromagnetic fields on Earth's surface that can be sensed by animals.

    “In addition, the Moon affects Earth’s magnetotail, thereby creating oscillating electromagnetic fields on Earth’s surface that can be sensed by animals (35, 36).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bevington, M.
Corresponding author
Bevington, Michael
Venue
Pathophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
211-222
ISSN
0928-4680 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1705762154
Cited by
50
References
156
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pathophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biofield Effects and Biophysics
Keywords
lunar gravity, lunar tides, lunar light, magnetotail, lunar magnetosphere, geomagnetic storms, geomagnetic disturbances, sferics, aurora, animal behavior, calcium flux, melatonin, magnetite, cryptochrome, acute myocardial infarction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review