CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 945

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD)

Meyer, Axel, Van de Peer, Yves·2005·BioEssays
DOI 10.1002/bies.20293
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An important mechanism for the evolution of phenotypic complexity, diversity and innovation, and the origin of novel gene functions is the duplication of genes and entire genomes. Recent phylogenomic studies suggest that, during the evolution of vertebrates, the entire genome was duplicated in two rounds (2R) of duplication. Later, ∼350 mya, in the stem lineage of ray‐finned (actinopterygian) fishes, but not in that of the land vertebrates, a third genome duplication occurred—the fish‐specific genome duplication (FSGD or 3R), leading, at least initially, to up to eight copies of the ancestral deuterostome genome. Therefore, the sarcopterygian (lobe‐finned fishes and tetrapods) genome possessed originally only half as many genes compared to the derived fishes, just like the most‐basal and species‐poor lineages of extant fishes that diverged from the fish stem lineage before the 3R duplication. Most duplicated genes were secondarily lost, yet some evolved new functions. The genomic complexity of the teleosts might be the reason for their evolutionary success and astounding biological diversity. BioEssays 27:937–945, 2005. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bies.20293

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The teleost-specific genome duplication (TGD) event provided an evolutionary context for investigating the origins of conserved elements.

    “The teleost-specific genome duplication (TGD) event36,37,38,39,40,41 provided an evolutionary context for investigating the origins of these conserved elements”

    From A genomic compendium of hundreds of teleost fishes reveals their evolutionary landscape (2026) · cites this paper as [38]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1007/978-3-642-86659-3 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1023/A:1022648729770 · DOI
  3. 10.1023/A:1022656931587 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0014-5793(96)01351-8 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/jez.b.40 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0959-437X(96)80026-8 · DOI
  7. 10.1163/156854295X00050 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026022 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.tig.2004.08.001 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02457.x · DOI
  11. 10.1038/ng855 · DOI
  12. 10.1023/A:1022600813840 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0955-0674(99)00039-3 · DOI
  14. 10.1101/gr.874803 · DOI
  15. 10.1101/gr.188801 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0959-437X(98)80039-7 · DOI
  17. 10.1023/A:1022681600462 · DOI
  18. 10.1098/rstb.2001.1035 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0168-9525(97)01367-X · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.0307968100 · DOI
  21. 10.1007/s002390010233 · DOI
  22. 10.1101/gr.155801 · DOI
  23. 10.1101/gr.214402 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199806)20:6<511::AID-BIES10>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.1072104 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1023/A:1022652814749 · DOI
  27. 10.1098/rstb.2001.0975 · DOI
  28. 10.1101/gr.640303 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/molbev/msh114 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.thbio.2004.03.004 · DOI
  31. 10.1186/gb-2004-5-12-250 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800635 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/icb/44.5.358 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.tig.2005.06.004 · DOI
  35. Takezaki N, 1995, Phylogenetic test of the molecular clock and linearized trees, Mol Biol Evol, 12, 823
  36. 10.1002/bies.20127 · DOI
  37. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132351 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/s00239-004-2613-z · DOI
  39. Nelson J, 1994, Fishes of the world
  40. 10.1016/j.tig.2004.07.005 · DOI
  41. 10.1038/nrg704 · DOI
  42. 10.1101/gr.1717804 · DOI
  43. 10.1101/gr.1712904 · DOI
  44. 10.2174/1389202043349048 · DOI
  45. Patterson C, 1993, An overview of the early fossil record of acanthomorphs, Bull Mar Sci, 52, 29

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Meyer, A., & Van de Peer, Y.
Venue
BioEssays
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-17
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
937-945
ISSN
  • 0265-9247
  • 1521-1878
DOI
10.1002/bies.20293
Cited by
945
References
4
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review