Cited by 198Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Missing data: A statistical framework for practice

Open access
Carpenter, James R., Smuk, Melanie·2021·Biometrical Journal

Abstract

Missing data are ubiquitous in medical research, yet there is still uncertainty over when restricting to the complete records is likely to be acceptable, when more complex methods (e.g. maximum likelihood, multiple imputation and Bayesian methods) should be used, how they relate to each other and the role of sensitivity analysis. This article seeks to address both applied practitioners and researchers interested in a more formal explanation of some of the results. For practitioners, the framework, illustrative examples and code should equip them with a practical approach to address the issues raised by missing data (particularly using multiple imputation), alongside an overview of how the various approaches in the literature relate. In particular, we describe how multiple imputation can be readily used for sensitivity analyses, which are still infrequently performed. For those interested in more formal derivations, we give outline arguments for key results, use simple examples to show how methods relate, and references for full details. The ideas are illustrated with a cohort study, a multi‐centre case control study and a randomised clinical trial.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bimj.202000196

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 94 references

1 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Carpenter J. R., 2015, Handbook of missing data methodology, 23
  2. 10.1177/1740774517711442 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–197 of 197

Metadata

Authors
Carpenter, J. R., & Smuk, M.
Affiliations
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Carpenter, James R.
Venue
Biometrical Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02-24
Volume
63
Issue
5
Pages
915-947
ISSN
  • 0323-3847 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4036
OpenAlex
W3130968222
Cited by
198
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 7
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biometrical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12023/21, MC_UU_12023/29, MC_UU_00004/07)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
missing data, multiple imputation, sensitivity analysis, maximum likelihood estimation, Bayesian analysis, missing data mechanisms, cohort studies, case-control study, randomized controlled trials
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review