The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving Genomic Prediction Using High‐Dimensional Secondary Phenotypes: The Genetic Latent Factor Approach
Open accessAbstract
Decreasing costs and new technologies have led to an increase in the amount of data available to plant breeding programs. High‐throughput phenotyping (HTP) platforms routinely generate high‐dimensional datasets of secondary features that may be used to improve genomic prediction accuracy. However, integration of these data comes with challenges such as multicollinearity, parameter estimation in settings, and the computational complexity of many standard approaches. Several methods have emerged to analyze such data, but interpretation of model parameters often remains challenging. We propose genetic latent factor best linear unbiased prediction (glfBLUP), a prediction pipeline that reduces the dimensionality of the original secondary HTP data using generative factor analysis. In short, glfBLUP uses redundancy filtered and regularized genetic and residual correlation matrices to fit a maximum likelihood factor model and estimate genetic latent factor scores. These latent factors are subsequently used in multitrait genomic prediction. Our approach performs better than alternatives in extensive simulations and a real‐world application, while producing easily interpretable and biologically relevant parameters. We discuss several possible extensions and highlight glfBLUP as the basis for a flexible and modular multitrait genomic prediction framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among dimension reduction methods, approaches that produce independent features such as factor or principal component analysis seem most promising, due to the lower number of correlations that need to be estimated and the ability of these secondary features to improve predictions for a focal trait of interest.
“Many dimension reduction methods exist, but approaches that produce independent features such as factor or principal component analysis seem most promising due to the lower number of correlations that need to be estimated and the ability of these secondary features to improve predictions for a focal trait of interest (Melsen et al. , 2025).”
From REML implementations of kernel-based genomic prediction models for genotype x environment x management interactions (2025) · cites this paper as Melsen et al. , 2025
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smith, A., Cullis, B., & Thompson, R. (2001) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.01138.x · Cited by 566
Togninalli, M., Wang, X., Kucera, T., Shrestha, S., Juliana, P., Mondal, S., Pinto, F., Govindan, V., Crespo-Herrera, L., Huerta-Espino, J., et al. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad336 · Cited by 49 · cited 1×
“Neural networks and deep learning have also been investigated as options for the integration of secondary HTP and genomic data (Togninalli et al. 2023).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- 10.1093/jxb/erad216 · DOI
- Anderson W. T.2003An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis.3rd ed.Wiley.
- 10.3389/fgene.2021.667358 · DOI
- 10.1177/1471082X231178591 · DOI
- 10.1093/comjnl/14.4.422 · DOI
- 10.3168/jds.2011‐4647 · DOI
- 10.1038/hdy.2013.16 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122‐014‐2373‐0 · DOI
- 10.3389/fgene.2022.822173 · DOI
- Dahl A. V.Hore V.Iotchkova andJ.Marchini.2013. “Network Inference in Matrix‐Variate Gaussian Models With Non‐Independent Noise.”arXiv December 5.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.1622. · DOI
- 10.1080/10618600.2019.1704296 · DOI
- 10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1214/20‐STS785 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10109‐016‐0239‐5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.05.007 · DOI
- 10.1093/imanum/22.3.329 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.1042 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02289658 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02289233 · DOI
- 10.1534/g3.118.200856 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.119.302949 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02288062 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598‐020‐65011‐2 · DOI
- Lumley T.2020.Leaps: Regression Subset SelectionR‐package version 3.1.https://CRAN.R‐project.org/package=leaps.https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.leaps. · DOI
- 10.1070/SM1967v001n04ABEH001994 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1534/genetics.109.113381 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.11.012 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02294246 · DOI
- 10.1002/bimj.202100105 · DOI
- Pavlidis P. J.Weston J.Cai andW. N.Grundy.2001. “Gene Functional Classification From Heterogeneous Data.” InProceedings of the Fifth Annual International Conference on Computational Biology 249–255.Association for Computing Machinery.https://doi.org/10.1145/369133.369228. · DOI
- Peeters C. F. W. C.Übelhör S. W.Mes et al.2019. “Stable Prediction with Radiomics Data.”arXiv March 27.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.11696. · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598‐022‐06935‐9 · DOI
- Piepho H. P., 2013, A Two‐Stage Approach to Recovery of Inter‐Block Information and Shrinkage of Block Effect Estimates, Communications in Biometry and Crop Science, 8, 10
- 10.1016/j.spasta.2017.10.003 · DOI
- 10.1534/g3.119.400598 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13059‐021‐02416‐w · DOI
- Sun J. J. E.Rutkoski J. A.Poland J.Crossa J. L.Jannink andM. E.Sorrells.2017. “Multitrait Random Regression or Simple Repeatability Model in High‐Throughput Phenotyping Data Improve Genomic Prediction for Wheat Grain Yield.”The Plant Genome10.https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2016.11.0111. · DOI
- 10.2134/agronj2006.0103 · DOI
- Thomson G.1939.The Factorial Analysis of Human Ability.University of London Press. · DOI
- 10.1111/jbg.12404 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.csda.2016.05.012 · DOI
- 10.1214/21‐AOS2074 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.2848 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Melsen, K. A. C., Gezan, S., Tolhurst, D. J., van Eeuwijk, F. A., & Peeters, C. F. W. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.06844 · Cited by 3
“…approaches that produce independent features such as factor or principal component analysis seem most promising due to the lower number of correlations that need to be estimated and the ability of these secondary features to improve predictions for a focal trait of interest (Melsen et al. , 2025).”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Melsen, K. A. C., Kunst, J. F., Crossa, J., Krause, M. R., van Eeuwijk, F. A., Kruijer, W., & Peeters, C. F. W.
- Affiliations
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
- Oregon State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Melsen, Killian A. C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biometrical Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-10
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e70081-e70081
- ISSN
- 0323-3847 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4036
- PMC
- PMC12504928
- OpenAlex
- W4414926613
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Biometrical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Keywords
- genomic prediction, high-throughput phenotyping, BLUP, dimensionality reduction, multicollinearity, plant breeding, genetic correlation, residual correlation, model interpretability
- MeSH terms
- Biometry, Phenotype, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review