Cited by 841Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Efficient multivariate linear mixed model algorithms for genome-wide association studies

Open access
Zhou, Xiang, Stephens, Matthew·2014·Nature Methods

Abstract

Multivariate linear mixed models (mvLMMs) are powerful tools for testing associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms and multiple correlated phenotypes while controlling for population stratification in genome-wide association studies. We present efficient algorithms in the genome-wide efficient mixed model association (GEMMA) software for fitting mvLMMs and computing likelihood ratio tests. These algorithms offer improved computation speed, power and P-value calibration over existing methods, and can deal with more than two phenotypes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.2848

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, X., & Stephens, M.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zhou, Xiang
  • Stephens, Matthew
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2014-02-16
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
407-409
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W1952660301
Cited by
841
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 14
FWCI
37.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Broad Institute
  • Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL092206, HL092206)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R56HG002585, HG02585, R01HG002585)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
multivariate linear mixed model, genome-wide association study, Gemma, likelihood ratio test, single nucleotide polymorphisms, correlated phenotypes, population stratification, computational efficiency, p-value calibration
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Software, Multivariate Analysis, Likelihood Functions, Linear Models, Genome, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review