The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell‐free metabolic engineering: Biomanufacturing beyond the cell
Open accessAbstract
Industrial biotechnology and microbial metabolic engineering are poised to help meet the growing demand for sustainable, low‐cost commodity chemicals and natural products, yet the fraction of biochemicals amenable to commercial production remains limited. Common problems afflicting the current state‐of‐the‐art include low volumetric productivities, build‐up of toxic intermediates or products, and byproduct losses via competing pathways. To overcome these limitations, cell‐free metabolic engineering (CFME) is expanding the scope of the traditional bioengineering model by using in vitro ensembles of catalytic proteins prepared from purified enzymes or crude lysates of cells for the production of target products. In recent years, the unprecedented level of control and freedom of design, relative to in vivo systems, has inspired the development of engineering foundations for cell‐free systems. These efforts have led to activation of long enzymatic pathways (>8 enzymes), near theoretical conversion yields, productivities greater than 100 mg L–1 h–1, reaction scales of >100 L, and new directions in protein purification, spatial organization, and enzyme stability. In the coming years, CFME will offer exciting opportunities to: (i) debug and optimize biosynthetic pathways; (ii) carry out design‐build‐test iterations without re‐engineering organisms; and (iii) perform molecular transformations when bioconversion yields, productivities, or cellular toxicity limit commercial feasibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bozell, J. J., & Petersen, G. R. (2010) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b922014c · Cited by 4,566
Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146
High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin
Paddon, C. J., Westfall, P. J., Pitera, D. J., Benjamin, K., Fisher, K., McPhee, D., Leavell, M. D., Tai, A., Main, A., Eng, D., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12051 · Cited by 2,060
Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution
Wang, H. H., Isaacs, F. J., Carr, P. A., Sun, Z. Z., Xu, G., Forest, C. R., & Church, G. M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08187 · Cited by 1,529 · cited 1×
“Moreover, strain modification techniques, such as MAGE [122], could be leveraged to add protease cleavage sites [23] or affinity tags [123] to essential enzymes; this would allow selective degradation or physical removal of unwanted pathways critical for growth.”
BackgroundA vesicle bioreactor as a step toward an artificial cell assembly
Noireaux, V., & Libchaber, A. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408236101 · Cited by 1,152
Five hard truths for synthetic biology
Kwok, R. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/463288a · Cited by 442
Cited by
Grim, R. G., Huang, Z., Guarnieri, M. T., Ferrell, J. R., Tao, L., & Schaidle, J. A. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee02410g · Cited by 454
Multienzyme Cascade Reactions—Status and Recent Advances
Sperl, J. M., & Sieber, V. (2018) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b03440 · Cited by 363
(2022) · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.2c00176 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Dudley, Q. M., Karim, A. S., & Jewett, M. C.
- Venue
- Biotechnology Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-10-15
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-82
- ISSN
- 1860-6768 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-7314
- OpenAlex
- W2095300485
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell‐free metabolic engineering: Biomanufacturing beyond the cell. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/biot.201400330
- The paper
- Dudley, Q. M., Karim, A. S., & Jewett, M. C. (2015). Cell‐free metabolic engineering: Biomanufacturing beyond the cell. Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201400330
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.