Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solvent denaturation

Schellman, John A.·1978·Biopolymers

Abstract

Solvent denaturation is developed along thermodynamic lines rather than from multiple‐binding theory. Almost all the relations derivable from site‐binding theory have their counterparts in the thermodynamic formulation showing that the details of binding models may be sufficient but are not necessary for the general description of solvent denaturation. Equations are derived for the effect of denaturant concentration on stability at constant temperature and on tm. It is recommended that the thermodynamic treatment be used instead of binding models unless stoichiometric interactions are demonstrable experimentally.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bip.1978.360170515

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 389

Metadata

Authors
Schellman, J. A.
Venue
Biopolymers
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-05
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
1305-1322
ISSN
  • 0006-3525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0282
OpenAlex
W4248782386
Cited by
389
References
14
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solvent denaturation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bip.1978.360170515
The paper
Schellman, J. A. (1978). Solvent denaturation. Biopolymers. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.1978.360170515

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.