The DOI matches its Crossref record; 172 of the 172 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in antimicrobial peptide immunobiology
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides are ancient components of the innate immune system and have been isolated from organisms spanning the phylogenetic spectrum. Over an evolutionary time span, these peptides have retained potency, in the face of highly mutable target microorganisms. This fact suggests important coevolutionary influences in the host–pathogen relationship. Despite their diverse origins, the majority of antimicrobial peptides have common biophysical parameters that are likely essential for activity, including small size, cationicity, and amphipathicity. Although more than 900 different antimicrobial peptides have been characterized, most can be grouped as belonging to one of three structural classes: (1) linear, often of α‐helical propensity; (2) cysteine stabilized, most commonly conforming to β‐sheet structure; and (3) those with one or more predominant amino acid residues, but variable in structure. Interestingly, these biophysical and structural features are retained in ribosomally as well as nonribosomally synthesized peptides. Therefore, it appears that a relatively limited set of physicochemical features is required for antimicrobial peptide efficacy against a broad spectrum of microbial pathogens. During the past several years, a number of themes have emerged within the field of antimicrobial peptide immunobiology. One developing area expands upon known microbicidal mechanisms of antimicrobial peptides to include targets beyond the plasma membrane. Examples include antimicrobial peptide activity involving structures such as extracellular polysaccharide and cell wall components, as well as the identification of an increasing number of intracellular targets. Additional areas of interest include an expanding recognition of antimicrobial peptide multifunctionality, and the identification of large antimicrobial proteins, and antimicrobial peptide or protein fragments derived thereof. The following discussion highlights such recent developments in antimicrobial peptide immunobiology, with an emphasis on the biophysical aspects of host‐defense polypeptide action and mechanisms of microbial resistance. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 84: 435–458, 2006 This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pathogen Recognition and Innate Immunity
Akira, S., Uematsu, S., & Takeuchi, O. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.015 · Cited by 11,952
Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Peptide Action and Resistance
Yeaman, M. R., & Yount, N. Y. (2003) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.55.1.2 · Cited by 3,001
Self-citationZasloff, M. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.15.5449 · Cited by 2,305
Shai, Y. (1999) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/s0005-2736(99)00200-x · Cited by 1,869
Sequence and specificity of two antibacterial proteins involved in insect immunity
Steiner, H., Hultmark, D., Engström, Å., Bennich, H., & Boman, H. G. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/292246a0 · Cited by 1,427
Defensins. Natural peptide antibiotics of human neutrophils.
Ganz, T., Selsted, M. E., Szklarek, D., Harwig, S. S., Daher, K., Bainton, D. F., & Lehrer, R. I. (1985) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci112120 · Cited by 1,416
Innate antimicrobial peptide protects the skin from invasive bacterial infection
Nizet, V., Ohtake, T., Lauth, X., Trowbridge, J., Rudisill, J., Dorschner, R. A., Pestonjamasp, V., Piraino, J., Huttner, K., & Gallo, R. L. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35106587 · Cited by 1,198
Hancock, R. E. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)80051-7 · Cited by 1,096
THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF MEMBRANE AND SURFACE PROTEINS
Eisenberg, D. (1984) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.003115 · Cited by 969
Park, C. B., Kim, H. S., & Kim, S. C. (1998) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.1998.8159 · Cited by 896
Cited by
Interaction Between the Microbiota, Epithelia, and Immune Cells in the Intestine
Kayama, H., Okumura, R., & Takeda, K. (2020) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-070119-115104 · Cited by 747
Eimer, W. A., Vijaya Kumar, D. K., Navalpur Shanmugam, N. K., Rodriguez, A. S., Mitchell, T., Washicosky, K. J., György, B., Breakefield, X. O., Tanzi, R. E., & Moir, R. D. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.030 · Cited by 674
Li, P., Zhou, C., Rayatpisheh, S., Ye, K., Poon, Y. F., Hammond, P. T., Duan, H., & Chan‐Park, M. B. (2012) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201104186 · Cited by 268
Regulation of Mast Cell Responses in Health and Disease
Gilfillan, A. M., & Beaven, M. A. (2011) · Critical Reviews™ in Immunology · doi:10.1615/critrevimmunol.v31.i6.30 · Cited by 259
Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Peptides
Di Somma, A., Moretta, A., Canè, C., Cirillo, A., & Duilio, A. (2020) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom10040652 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Yount, N. Y., Bayer, A. S., Xiong, Y. Q., & Yeaman, M. R.
- Venue
- Peptide Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 435-458
- ISSN
- 0006-3525 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001374696
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 172
- FWCI
- 13.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in antimicrobial peptide immunobiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bip.20543
- The paper
- Yount, N. Y., Bayer, A. S., Xiong, Y. Q., & Yeaman, M. R. (2006). Advances in antimicrobial peptide immunobiology. Peptide Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.20543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.