The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A revisit to the three‐dimensional structure of B‐type starch
Abstract
A new three‐dimensional structure of B‐starch is proposed in which the unit cell contains 12 glucose residues located in two left‐handed, parallel‐stranded double helices packed in a parallel register; 36 water molecules are located between these helices. Chains are crystallized in the hexagonal space group P6 1, with lattice parameters a = b = 1.85 nm, c = 1.04 nm. The space group symmetry was derived from an exhaustive analysis of the large body of structural studies published so far. Diffraction data used in this work were taken from the previously reported x‐ray fiber diffractogram [H.C. Wu and A. Sarko (1978), Carbohydrate Research, 61, 7–25] after adequate reindexing. The final R factor is 0.145 for the three‐dimensional data. The repeating unit consists of a maltose molecule where the glucose residues have the 4 C 1 pyranose conformation and are α(1 → 4) linked. The conformation of the glycosidic linkage is characterized by torsion angles (Φ, Ψ) that take the values (83.8°, −144.6°) and (84.3°, −144.1°), whereas the valence angles at the glycosidic bridge have a magnitude of 115.8° and 116.5°, respectively. The primary hydroxyl groups exist in a gauche–gauche conformation. There is no intramolecular hydrogen bond. Within the double helix, interstrand stabilization is achieved without any steric conflict and through the occurrence of O(2)…O(6) type of hydrogen bonds. The model presented here, with an hydration around 27% w/w, corresponds to a well‐ordered crystalline sample, since all the water molecules could be located with no apparent sign of a disorder. Half of the water molecules are tightly bound to the double helices; the remainder forms a complex network centered around the sixfold screw axis of the unit cell. The consistency of the present structural model, with both physicochemical and biochemical aspects of the crystalline component of tuber starch granules, is analyzed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microscopy of starch: evidence of a new level of granule organization
Gallant, D. J., Bouchet, B., & Baldwin, P. M. (1997) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/s0144-8617(97)00008-8 · Cited by 1,049
Effect of Acid Hydrolysis on Starch Structure and Functionality: A Review
Wang, S., & Copeland, L. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2012.684551 · Cited by 490
Formation of starch in plant cells
Pfister, B., & Zeeman, S. C. (2016) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2250-x · Cited by 423
The structure of four waxy starches related to gelatinization and retrogradation
Shi, Y.-C., & Seib, P. A. (1992) · Carbohydrate Research · doi:10.1016/0008-6215(92)85066-9 · Cited by 377
Human α‐amylase and starch digestion: An interesting marriage
Butterworth, P. J., Warren, F. J., & Ellis, P. R. (2011) · Starch - Stärke · doi:10.1002/star.201000150 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Imberty, A., & Perez, S.
- Venue
- Biopolymers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1205-1221
- ISSN
- 0006-3525 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0282
- OpenAlex
- W2073844716
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A revisit to the three‐dimensional structure of B‐type starch. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bip.360270803
- The paper
- Imberty, A., & Perez, S. (1988). A revisit to the three‐dimensional structure of B‐type starch. Biopolymers. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.360270803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.