Cited by 364Food composition and propertiesEnzyme Production and CharacterizationGlycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus

Human α‐amylase and starch digestion: An interesting marriage

Butterworth, Peter J., Warren, Frederick J., Ellis, Peter R.·2011·Starch - Stärke

Abstract

α‐Amylase catalyses the first step in the digestion of starch, a main source of carbohydrate in the human diet. Amylase present in human saliva was one of the first enzymes ever to be recognised but many puzzles remain about the molecular mechanisms involved in amylolysis of starch and even of the physiological role of the salivary amylase itself. Native starch granules represent a formidable challenge for attack from an enzyme in solution. Moreover the frequently reported differences in the susceptibility to amylolysis of starches from various botanical species, plus the changes that occur in starch structure and properties during domestic and commercial food processing means that studies of the enzymology of starch digestion can be challenging. We review the molecular properties of mammalian α‐amylase including its genetics, and speculate on the role of salivary amylase in digestion of dietary starch. Also considered are enzyme kinetic approaches that have been used in vitro studies of amylase digestion of starches. Such studies can result in better understanding of reasons for the differences in glycaemic responses of humans following ingestion of different starch containing foods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/star.201000150

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The duration of starch exposure to salivary amylase is very brief compared to exposure to pancreatic α-amylase.

    “Notably, the duration of starch exposure to salivary amylase is very brief (i.e., seconds-minutes) compared to the exposure to pancreatic α-amylase (i.e., hours) (Dahlqvist et al., 1961; Butterworth et al., 2011; Hoebler et al., 1998; Woolnough et al., 2008).”

    From Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health (2017) · cites this paper as Butterworth et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Butterworth, P. J., Warren, F. J., & Ellis, P. R.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Butterworth, Peter J.
Venue
Starch - Stärke
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-02-23
Volume
63
Issue
7
Pages
395-405
ISSN
  • 0038-9056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-379X
OpenAlex
W2005324630
Cited by
364
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Starch - Stärke (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/H004866/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
Keywords
salivary amylase, alpha-amylase, starch hydrolysis, amylolysis, starch granule structure, enzyme kinetics, glycemic response, starch processing, dietary starch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review