The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conformational energy studies of β‐sheets of model silk fibroin peptides. I. Sheets of poly(Ala‐Gly) chains
Abstract
A new model structure is proposed for the silk I form of the crystalline domains of Bombyx mori silk fibroin and the corresponding crystal form of poly(L‐Ala‐Gly). It was deduced from conformational energy computations on stacked sheet structures of poly(L‐Ala‐Gly). The novel sheet structure contains interstrand hydrogen bonds but is composed of antiparallel polypeptide chains whose conformation differs from that of the antiparallel β‐sheets that constitute the silk II structure. The strands of the new sheet have a two‐residue repeat, in which the Ala residues adopt a right‐handed and the Gly residues a left‐handed sheet‐like conformation. The computed unit cell is orthorhombic, with cell dimensions a = 8.94 Å, b = 6.46 Å, and c = 11.26 Å. The model accounts for most spacings in the observed fiber x‐ray diffraction patterns of silk I and of the silk‐I‐like form of poly(L‐Ala‐Gly), and it is consistent with nmr and ir spectroscopic data. As a test of the computations, the well‐established β‐sheet structure of silk II and the corresponding form of poly(L‐Ala‐Gly) have been reproduced. The computed energies for the two forms of poly(L‐Ala‐Gly) indicate that the silk‐II‐like form is more stable, by about 1.0 kcal/mol per residue. The main difference between the two structures is the orientation of the Ala side chains of neighboring strands in each sheet. In the Pauling–Corey β‐sheet and in the silk II form, referred to as an “in‐register” structure, the Ala side chains of every strand point to the same side of a sheet. In the silk I structure, referred to as “out‐of‐register,” the side chains of Ala residues in adjacent strands point to opposite sides of the sheet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structures, mechanical properties and applications of silk fibroin materials
Koh, L.-D., Cheng, Y., Teng, C.-P., Khin, Y.-W., Loh, X.-J., Tee, S.-Y., Low, M., Ye, E., Yu, H.-D., Zhang, Y.-W., et al. (2015) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.001 · Cited by 1,241
Nova, A., Keten, S., Pugno, N. M., Redaelli, A., & Buehler, M. J. (2010) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl101341w · Cited by 414
Plasticizing Silk Protein for On‐Skin Stretchable Electrodes
Chen, G., Matsuhisa, N., Liu, Z., Qi, D., Cai, P., Jiang, Y., Wan, C., Cui, Y., Leow, W. R., Liu, Z., et al. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201800129 · Cited by 343
Application of the PM6 method to modeling proteins
Stewart, J. J. P. (2009) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-008-0420-y · Cited by 323
Crosslinking strategies for silk fibroin hydrogels: promising biomedical materials
Farokhi, M., Aleemardani, M., Solouk, A., Mirzadeh, H., Teuschl, A. H., & Redl, H. (2021) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-605x/abb615 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Fossey, S. A., Némethy, G., Gibson, K. D., & Scheraga, H. A.
- Venue
- Biopolymers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1529-1541
- ISSN
- 0006-3525 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0282
- OpenAlex
- W2073229964
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conformational energy studies of β‐sheets of model silk fibroin peptides. I. Sheets of poly(Ala‐Gly) chains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bip.360311309
- The paper
- Fossey, S. A., Némethy, G., Gibson, K. D., & Scheraga, H. A. (1991). Conformational energy studies of β‐sheets of model silk fibroin peptides. I. Sheets of poly(Ala‐Gly) chains. Biopolymers. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.360311309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.