The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shape complementarity at protein–protein interfaces
Abstract
A matching algorithm using surface complementarity between receptor and ligand protein molecules is outlined. The molecular surfaces are represented by “critical points,” describing holes and knobs. Holes (maxima of a shape function) are matched with knobs (minima). This simple and appealing surface representation has been previously described by Connolly [(1986) Biopolymers, Vol. 25, pp. 1229–1247]. However, attempts to implement this description in a docking scheme have been unsuccessful (e.g., Connolly, ibid.). In order to decrease the combinatorial complexity, and to make the execution time affordable, four critical hole/knob point matches were sought. This approach failed since some bound interfaces are relatively flat and do not possess four critical point matches. On the other hand, matchings of fewer critical points require a very time‐consuming, full conformational (grid) space search [Wang, (1991) Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 12, pp. 746–750]. Here we show that despite the initial failure of this approach, with a simple and straightforward modification in the matching algorithm, this surface representation works well. Out of the 16 protein‐protein complexes we have tried, 15 were successfully docked, including two immunoglobulins. The entire molecular surfaces were considered, with absolutely no additional information regarding the binding sites. The whole process is completely automated, with no manual intervention, either in the input atomic coordinate data, or in the matching. We have been able to reach this level of performance with the hole/knob surface description by using pairs of critical points along with their surface normals in the calculation of the transformation matrix. The success of this approach suggests that future docking methods should use geometric docking as the first screening filter. As a geometrically based docking methodology predicts correct, along with incorrect, receptor‐ligand bound conformations, all solutions need to undergo energy screening to differentiate between them. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method for registration of 3-D shapes
Besl, P. J., & McKay, N. D. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.121791 · Cited by 18,103
The protein data bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures
Bernstein, F. C., Koetzle, T. F., Williams, G. J. B., Meyer, E. F., Brice, M. D., Rodgers, J. R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T., & Tasumi, M. (1977) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3 · Cited by 8,578
Solvent-Accessible Surfaces of Proteins and Nucleic Acids
Connolly, M. L. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6879170 · Cited by 2,745
AREAS, VOLUMES, PACKING, AND PROTEIN STRUCTURE
Richards, F. M. (1977) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Bioengineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bb.06.060177.001055 · Cited by 2,661
Analytical molecular surface calculation
Connolly, M. L. (1983) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0021889883010985 · Cited by 2,508
A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions
Kuntz, I. D., Blaney, J. M., Oatley, S. J., Langridge, R., & Ferrin, T. E. (1982) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(82)90153-x · Cited by 2,278
Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing
Goodsell, D. S., & Olson, A. J. (1990) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340080302 · Cited by 1,285
Katchalski-Katzir, E., Shariv, I., Eisenstein, M., Friesem, A. A., Aflalo, C., & Vakser, I. A. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.6.2195 · Cited by 1,107
“Soft docking”: Matching of molecular surface cubes
Jiang, F., & Kim, S.-H. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)90859-5 · Cited by 407
Protein docking and complementarity
Shoichet, B. K., & Kuntz, I. D. (1991) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(91)80222-g · Cited by 298
Cited by
PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking
Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Inbar, Y., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki481 · Cited by 3,018
Self-citationAnatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces
Bogan, A. A., & Thorn, K. S. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1843 · Cited by 1,988
Chen, L., Willis, S. N., Wei, A., Smith, B. J., Fletcher, J. I., Hinds, M. G., Colman, P. M., Day, C. L., Adams, J. M., & Huang, D. C. S. (2005) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.12.030 · Cited by 1,816
Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions
Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., & Nussinov, R. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10115 · Cited by 1,294
Self-citationHelical Assembly in the MyD88-IRAK4-IRAK2 Complex in TLR/IL-1R Signalling
Lin, S.-C., Lo, Y.-C., & Wu, H. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09121 · Cited by 1,111
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Norel, R., Lin, S. L., Wolfson, H. J., & Nussinov, R.
- Venue
- Biopolymers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 933-940
- ISSN
- 0006-3525 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0282
- OpenAlex
- W2056034415
- Cited by
- 1,208
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 5.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shape complementarity at protein–protein interfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bip.360340711
- The paper
- Norel, R., Lin, S. L., Wolfson, H. J., & Nussinov, R. (1994). Shape complementarity at protein–protein interfaces. Biopolymers. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.360340711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.