The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reduction kinetics of Fe(III), Co(III), U(VI), Cr(VI), and Tc(VII) in cultures of dissimilatory metal‐reducing bacteria
Abstract
The reduction kinetics of Fe(III)citrate, Fe(III)NTA, Co(III)EDTA−, U(VI)O 22+, Cr(VI)O 42−, and Tc(VII)O 4− were studied in cultures of dissimilatory metal reducing bacteria (DMRB): Shewanella alga strain BrY, Shewanella putrefaciens strain CN32, Shewanella oneidensis strain MR‐1, and Geobacter metallireducens strain GS‐15. Reduction rates were metal specific with the following rate trend: Fe(III)citrate ≥ Fe(III)NTA > Co(III)EDTA− > UO 22+ > CrO 42− > TcO 4−, except for CrO 42− when H 2 was used as electron donor. The metal reduction rates were also electron donor dependent with faster rates observed for H 2 than lactate− for all Shewanella species despite higher initial lactate (10 m M) than H 2 (0.48 m M). The bioreduction of CrO 42− was anomalously slower compared to the other metals with H 2 as an electron donor relative to lactate and reduction ceased before all the CrO 42− had been reduced. Transmission electron microscopic (TEM) and energy‐dispersive spectroscopic (EDS) analyses performed on selected solids at experiment termination found precipitates of reduced U and Tc in association with the outer cell membrane and in the periplasm of the bacteria. The kinetic rates of metal reduction were correlated with the precipitation of reduced metal phases and their causal relationship discussed. The experimental rate data were well described by a Monod kinetic expression with respect to the electron acceptor for all metals except CrO 42−, for which the Monod model had to be modified to account for incomplete reduction. However, the Monod models became statistically over‐parametrized, resulting in large uncertainties of their parameters. A first‐order approximation to the Monod model also effectively described the experimental results, but the rate coefficients exhibited far less uncertainty. The more precise rate coefficients of the first‐order model provided a better means than the Monod parameters, to quantitatively compare the reduction rates between metals, electron donors, and DMRB species. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 80: 637–649, 2002.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lovley, D. R., & Phillips, E. J. P. (1988) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.54.6.1472-1480.1988 · Cited by 2,395
Cited by
Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) Reduction
Lovley, D. R., Holmes, D. E., & Nevin, K. P. (2004) · Advances in Microbial Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2911(04)49005-5 · Cited by 1,471
Microbial reduction of graphene oxide by Shewanella
Wang, G., Qian, F., Saltikov, C. W., Jiao, Y., & Li, Y. (2011) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-011-0112-2 · Cited by 361
Xu, Y., Ou, Q., van der Hoek, J. P., Liu, G., & Lompe, K. M. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c07035 · Cited by 325
Cao, B., Shi, L., Brown, R. N., Xiong, Y., Fredrickson, J. K., Romine, M. F., Marshall, M. J., Lipton, M. S., & Beyenal, H. (2011) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02407.x · Cited by 314
Self-citationOrdered low-temperature dolomite mediated by carboxyl-group density of microbial cell walls
Kenward, P. A., Fowle, D. A., Goldstein, R. H., Ueshima, M., González, L. A., & Roberts, J. A. (2013) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/05171312168 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, C., Gorby, Y. A., Zachara, J. M., Fredrickson, J. K., & Brown, C. F.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-10-11
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 637-649
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W1988088510
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.