The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simulation of growth and detachment in biofilm systems under defined hydrodynamic conditions
Open accessAbstract
Detachment from biofilms was evaluated using a mixed culture biofilm grown on primary wastewater in a tube reactor. The growth of biofilms and the detachment of biomass from biofilms are strongly influenced by hydrodynamic conditions. In a long‐term study, three biofilms were cultivated in a biofilm tube reactor. The conducted experiments of biofilm growth and detachment can be divided into three phases: 1) an exponential phase with a rapid increase of the biofilm thickness, 2) a quasi‐steady‐state with spontaneous fluctuation of the biofilm thickness between 500 and 1,200 μm in the investigated biofilm systems, and 3) a washout experiment with increased shear stress in three to four steps after several weeks of quasi‐steady‐state. Whereas the biofilm thickness during the homogeneous growth phase can be regarded constant throughout the reactor, it was found to be very heterogeneous during the quasi‐steady‐state and the washout experiments. Growth and detachment during all three phases was simulated with the same one‐dimensional biofilm model. For each of the three phases, a different detachment rate model was used. During the homogeneous growth phase, detachment was modeled proportional to the biofilm growth rate. During the quasi‐steady‐state phase, detachment was described by random detachment events assuming a base biofilm thickness. Finally, the washout experiment was simulated with detachment being a function of the biofilm thickness before the increase of the shear stress. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 81: 607–617, 2003.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effect of shear stress on biofilm loss rate
Rittman, B. E. (1982) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.260240219 · Cited by 371
Cited by
Marine biofilms on artificial surfaces: structure and dynamics
Salta, M., Wharton, J. A., Blache, Y., Stokes, K. R., & Briand, J. (2013) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12186 · Cited by 473
Programmable biofilm-based materials from engineered curli nanofibres
Nguyen, P. Q., Botyanszki, Z., Tay, P. K. R., & Joshi, N. S. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5945 · Cited by 366
Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from municipal wastewater effluent using microalgal biofilms
Boelee, N. C., Temmink, H., Janssen, M., Buisman, C. J. N., & Wijffels, R. H. (2011) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.044 · Cited by 344
Syron, E., & Casey, E. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0719428 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Horn, H., Reiff, H., & Morgenroth, E.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-03
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 607-617
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W1972971715
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.