The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optknock: A bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization
Abstract
The advent of genome‐scale models of metabolism has laid the foundation for the development of computational procedures for suggesting genetic manipulations that lead to overproduction. In this work, the computational OptKnock framework is introduced for suggesting gene deletion strategies leading to the overproduction of chemicals or biochemicals in E. coli. This is accomplished by ensuring that a drain towards growth resources (i.e., carbon, redox potential, and energy) must be accompanied, due to stoichiometry, by the production of a desired product. Computational results for gene deletions for succinate, lactate, and 1,3‐propanediol (PDO) production are in good agreement with mutant strains published in the literature. While some of the suggested deletion strategies are straightforward and involve eliminating competing reaction pathways, many others suggest complex and nonintuitive mechanisms of compensating for the removed functionalities. Finally, the OptKnock procedure, by coupling biomass formation with chemical production, hints at a growth selection/adaptation system for indirectly evolving overproducing mutants. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals. Biotechnol Bioeng 84: 647–657, 2003.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome-Scale Reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Metabolic Network
Förster, J., Famili, I., Fu, P., Palsson, B. Ø., & Nielsen, J. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.234503 · Cited by 1,069
Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth
Ibarra, R. U., Edwards, J. S., & Palsson, B. O. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01149 · Cited by 857 · cited 2×
“Interestingly, recent work suggests that even when FBA predictions under the biomass maximization assumption seem to fail, metabolic networks can be evolved, for certain cases, towards maximum growth (i.e., biomass yield) through adaptive evolution (Ibarra et al., 2002).”
BackgroundStoichiometric interpretation of Escherichia coli glucose catabolism under various oxygenation rates
Varma, A., Boesch, B. W., & Palsson, B. O. (1993) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.59.8.2465-2473.1993 · Cited by 316
Cited by
What is flux balance analysis?
Orth, J. D., Thiele, I., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1614 · Cited by 3,903
Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0
Schellenberger, J., Que, R., Fleming, R. M. T., Thiele, I., Orth, J. D., Feist, A. M., Zielinski, D. C., Bordbar, A., Lewis, N. E., Rahmanian, S., et al. (2011) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.308 · Cited by 1,835
COBRApy: COnstraints-Based Reconstruction and Analysis for Python
Ebrahim, A., Lerman, J. A., Palsson, B. O., & Hyduke, D. R. (2013) · BMC Systems Biology · doi:10.1186/1752-0509-7-74 · Cited by 1,378
Probiotics, gut microbiota, and their influence on host health and disease
Sánchez, B., Delgado, S., Blanco‐Míguez, A., Lourenço, A., Gueimonde, M., & Margolles, A. (2017) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.201600240 · Cited by 1,104
Constraining the metabolic genotype–phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods
Lewis, N. E., Nagarajan, H., & Palsson, B. O. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2737 · Cited by 779
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgard, A. P., Pharkya, P., & Maranas, C. D.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-10-07
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 647-657
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2130364940
- Cited by
- 1,256
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.