Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Membrane‐aerated microbioreactor for high‐throughput bioprocessing

Zanzotto, Andrea, Szita, Nicolas, Boccazzi, Paolo, Lessard, Philip, Sinskey, Anthony J., Jensen, Klavs F.·2004·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

A microbioreactor with a volume of microliters is fabricated out of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) and glass. Aeration of microbial cultures is through a gas‐permeable PDMS membrane. Sensors are integrated for on‐line measurement of optical density (OD), dissolved oxygen (DO), and pH. All three parameter measurements are based on optical methods. Optical density is monitored via transmittance measurements through the well of the microbioreactor while dissolved oxygen and pH are measured using fluorescence lifetime‐based sensors incorporated into the body of the microbioreactor. Bacterial fermentations carried out in the microbioreactor under well‐defined conditions are compared to results obtained in a 500‐mL bench‐scale bioreactor. It is shown that the behavior of the bacteria in the microbioreactor is similar to that in the larger bioreactor. This similarity includes growth kinetics, dissolved oxygen profile within the vessel over time, pH profile over time, final number of cells, and cell morphology. Results from off‐line analysis of the medium to examine organic acid production and substrate utilization are presented. By changing the gaseous environmental conditions, it is demonstrated that oxygen levels within the microbioreactor can be manipulated. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the sensitivity and reproducibility of the microbioreactor system are such that statistically significant differences in the time evolution of the OD, DO, and pH can be used to distinguish between different physiological states. Finally, modeling of the transient oxygen transfer within the microbioreactor based on observed and predicted growth kinetics is used to quantitatively characterize oxygen depletion in the system. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.20140

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Zanzotto, A., Szita, N., Boccazzi, P., Lessard, P., Sinskey, A. J., & Jensen, K. F.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06-28
Volume
87
Issue
2
Pages
243-254
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W2020514846
Cited by
211
References
0
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Membrane‐aerated microbioreactor for high‐throughput bioprocessing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.20140
The paper
Zanzotto, A., Szita, N., Boccazzi, P., Lessard, P., Sinskey, A. J., & Jensen, K. F. (2004). Membrane‐aerated microbioreactor for high‐throughput bioprocessing. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20140

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.