Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BioLogic gates enable logical transcription control in mammalian cells

Open access
Kramer, Beat P., Fischer, Cornelius, Fussenegger, Martin·2004·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

The architecture of gene regulatory networks is reminiscent of electronic circuits. Modular building blocks that respond in a logical way to one or several inputs are connected to perform a variety of complex tasks. Gene circuit engineers have pioneered the construction of artificial gene regulatory networks with the intention to pave the way for the construction of therapeutic gene circuits for next‐generation gene therapy approaches. However, due to the lack of a critical amount of eukaryotic cell‐compatible gene regulation systems, the field has so far been limited to prokaryotes. Recent development of several mammalian cell‐compatible expression control systems laid the foundations for the assembly of transcription control modules that can respond to several inputs. Herein, three approaches to evoke combinatorial transcription control have been followed: (i) construction of artificial promoters with up to three operator sites for regulatory proteins, and (ii) parallel and (iii) serial linking of two gene regulation systems. We have combined tetracycline‐, streptogramin‐, macrolide‐, and butyrolactone transcription control systems to engineer BioLogic gates of the NOT IF‐, AND‐, NOT IF IF‐, NAND‐, OR‐, NOR‐, and INVERTER‐type in mammalian cells, which are able to respond to up to three different small molecule inputs. BioLogic gates enable logical transcriptional control in mammalian cells and, in combination with modern transduction technologies, could serve as versatile tools for regulated gene expression and as building blocks for complex artificial gene regulatory networks for applications in gene therapy, tissue engineering, and biotechnology. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.20142

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Kramer, B. P., Fischer, C., & Fussenegger, M.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07-23
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
478-484
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W2141170384
Cited by
184
References
5
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BioLogic gates enable logical transcription control in mammalian cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.20142
The paper
Kramer, B. P., Fischer, C., & Fussenegger, M. (2004). BioLogic gates enable logical transcription control in mammalian cells. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20142

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.