The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High solid simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of wet oxidized corn stover to ethanol
Abstract
In this study ethanol was produced from corn stover pretreated by alkaline and acidic wet oxidation (WO) (195°C, 15 min, 12 bar oxygen) followed by nonisothermal simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF). In the first step of the SSF, small amounts of cellulases were added at 50°C, the optimal temperature of enzymes, in order to obtain better mixing condition due to some liquefaction. In the second step more cellulases were added in combination with dried baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) at 30°C. The phenols (0.4–0.5 g/L) and carboxylic acids (4.6–5.9 g/L) were present in the hemicellulose rich hydrolyzate at subinhibitory levels, thus no detoxification was needed prior to SSF of the whole slurry. Based on the cellulose available in the WO corn stover 83% of the theoretical ethanol yield was obtained under optimized SSF conditions. This was achieved with a substrate concentration of 12% dry matter (DM) acidic WO corn stover at 30 FPU/g DM (43.5 FPU/g cellulose) enzyme loading. Even with 20 and 15 FPU/g DM (corresponding to 29 and 22 FPU/g cellulose) enzyme loading, ethanol yields of 76 and 73%, respectively, were obtained. After 120 h of SSF the highest ethanol concentration of 52 g/L (6 vol.%) was achieved, which exceeds the technical and economical limit of the industrial‐scale alcohol distillation. The SSF results showed that the cellulose in pretreated corn stover can be efficiently fermented to ethanol with up to 15% DM concentration. A further increase of substrate concentration reduced the ethanol yield significant as a result of insufficient mass transfer. It was also shown that the fermentation could be followed with an easy monitoring system based on the weight loss of the produced CO 2. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ethanol production from biomass: technology and commercialization status
Mielenz, J. R. (2001) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5274(00)00211-3 · Cited by 440
Cited by
Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Wastes to Improve Ethanol and Biogas Production: A Review
Taherzadeh, M. J., & Karimi, K. (2008) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms9091621 · Cited by 2,634
Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks
Sánchez, Ó. J., & Cardona, C. A. (2008) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.013 · Cited by 1,826
Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities
Jørgensen, H., Kristensen, J. B., & Felby, C. (2007) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.4 · Cited by 1,143
Acid-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: A review
Taherzadeh, M. J., & Karimi, K. (2007) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.2.3.472-499 · Cited by 1,013
Maurya, D. P., Singla, A., & Negi, S. (2015) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-015-0279-4 · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Varga, E., Klinke, H. B., Réczey, K., & Thomsen, A. B.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10-06
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 567-574
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2153540661
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.