The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Group‐specific primer and probe sets to detect methanogenic communities using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction
Abstract
Real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a highly sensitive method that can be used for the detection and quantification of microbial populations without cultivating them in anaerobic processes and environmental samples. This work was conducted to design primer and probe sets for the detection of methanogens using a real‐time PCR with the TaqMan system. Six group‐specific methanogenic primer and probe sets were designed. These sets separately detect four orders ( Methanococcales , Methanobacteriales , Methanomicrobiales , and Methanosarcinales ) along with two families ( Methanosarcinaceae and Methanosaetaceae ) of the order Methanosarcinales . We also designed the universal primer and probe sets that specifically detect the 16S rDNA of prokaryotes and of the domain Bacteria and Archaea , and which are fully compatible with the TaqMan real‐time PCR system. Target‐group specificity of each primer and probe set was empirically verified by testing DNA isolated from 28 archaeal cultures and by analyzing potential false results. In general, each primer and probe set was very specific to the target group. The primer and probe sets designed in this study can be used to detect and quantify the order‐level (family‐level in the case of Methanosarcinales ) methanogenic groups in anaerobic biological processes and various environments. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya.
Woese, C. R., Kandler, O., & Wheelis, M. L. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 · Cited by 6,128
Cited by
Vrieze, A., Van Nood, E., Holleman, F., Salojärvi, J., Kootte, R. S., Bartelsman, J. F. W. M., Dallinga–Thie, G. M., Ackermans, M. T., Serlie, M. J., Oozeer, R., et al. (2012) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.031 · Cited by 2,913
Human gut microbiota in obesity and after gastric bypass
Zhang, H., DiBaise, J. K., Zuccolo, A., Kudrna, D., Braidotti, M., Yu, Y., Parameswaran, P., Crowell, M. D., Wing, R., Rittmann, B. E., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0812600106 · Cited by 1,880
Self-citationEvidence of Increasing Antibiotic Resistance Gene Abundances in Archived Soils since 1940
Knapp, C. W., Dolfing, J., Ehlert, P. A. I., & Graham, D. W. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es901221x · Cited by 837
Tap, J., Derrien, M., Törnblom, H., Brazeilles, R., Cools-Portier, S., Doré, J., Störsrud, S., Le Nevé, B., Öhman, L., & Simrén, M. (2017) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.049 · Cited by 642
Maturation of the gut microbiome and risk of asthma in childhood
Stokholm, J., Blaser, M. J., Thorsen, J., Rasmussen, M. A., Waage, J., Vinding, R. K., Schoos, A.-M. M., Kunøe, A., Fink, N. R., Chawes, B. L., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02573-2 · Cited by 614
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, Y., Lee, C., Kim, J., & Hwang, S.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-04
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 670-679
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2089196290
- Cited by
- 1,664
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.