Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differentiation and lineage selection of mouse embryonic stem cells in a stirred bench scale bioreactor with automated process control

Schroeder, Magnus, Niebruegge, Sylvia, Werner, Andreas, Willbold, Elmar, Burg, Monika, Ruediger, Manfred, Field, Loren J., Lehmann, Juergen, Zweigerdt, Robert·2005·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

It is well established that embryonic stem (ES) cells can differentiate into functional cardiomyocytes in vitro. ES‐derived cardiomyocytes could be used for pharmaceutical and therapeutic applications, provided that they can be generated in sufficient quantity and with sufficient purity. To enable large‐scale culture of ES‐derived cells, we have developed a robust and scalable bioprocess that allows direct embryoid body (EB) formation in a fully controlled, stirred 2 L bioreactor following inoculation with a single cell suspension of mouse ES cells. Utilizing a pitched‐blade‐turbine, parameters for optimal cell expansion as well as efficient ES cell differentiation were established. Optimization of stirring conditions resulted in the generation of high‐density suspension cultures containing 12.5 × 10 6 cells/mL after 9 days of differentiation. Approximately 30%–40% of the EBs formed in this process vigorously contracted, indicating robust cardiomyogenic induction. An ES cell clone carrying a recombinant DNA molecule comprised of the cardiomyocyte‐restricted alpha myosin heavy chain (αMHC) promoter and a neomycin resistance gene was used to establish the utility of this bioprocess to efficiently generate ES‐derived cardiomyocytes. The genetically engineered ES cells were cultured directly in the stirred bioreactor for 9 days, followed by antibiotic treatment for another 9 days. The protocol resulted in the generation of essentially pure cardiomyocyte cultures, with a total yield of 1.28 × 10 9 cells in a single 2 L bioreactor run. This study thus provides an important step towards the large‐scale generation of ES‐derived cells for therapeutic and industrial applications. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.20668

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Schroeder, M., Niebruegge, S., Werner, A., Willbold, E., Burg, M., Ruediger, M., Field, L. J., Lehmann, J., & Zweigerdt, R.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-27
Volume
92
Issue
7
Pages
920-933
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W2077276126
Cited by
176
References
1
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differentiation and lineage selection of mouse embryonic stem cells in a stirred bench scale bioreactor with automated process control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.20668
The paper
Schroeder, M., Niebruegge, S., Werner, A., Willbold, E., Burg, M., Ruediger, M., Field, L. J., Lehmann, J., & Zweigerdt, R. (2005). Differentiation and lineage selection of mouse embryonic stem cells in a stirred bench scale bioreactor with automated process control. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20668

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.