The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol by Escherichia coli: A new platform for metabolic engineering
Abstract
The worldwide surplus of glycerol generated as inevitable byproduct of biodiesel fuel and oleochemical production is resulting in the shutdown of traditional glycerol‐producing/refining plants and new applications are needed for this now abundant carbon source. In this article we report our finding that Escherichia coli can ferment glycerol in a pH‐dependent manner. We hypothesize that glycerol fermentation is linked to the availability of CO 2, which under acidic conditions is produced by the oxidation of formate by the enzyme formate hydrogen lyase (FHL). In agreement with this hypothesis, glycerol fermentation was severely impaired by blocking the activity of FHL. We demonstrated that, unlike CO 2, hydrogen (the other product of FHL‐mediated formate oxidation) had a negative impact on cell growth and glycerol fermentation. In addition, supplementation of the medium with CO 2 partially restored the ability of an FHL‐deficient strain to ferment glycerol. High pH resulted in low CO 2 generation (low activity of FHL) and availability (most CO 2 is converted to bicarbonate), and consequently very inefficient fermentation of glycerol. Most of the fermented glycerol was recovered in the reduced compounds ethanol and succinate (93% of the product mixture), which reflects the highly reduced state of glycerol and confirms the fermentative nature of this process. Since glycerol is a cheap, abundant, and highly reduced carbon source, our findings should enable the development of an E. coli‐based platform for the anaerobic production of reduced chemicals from glycerol at yields higher than those obtained from common sugars, such as glucose. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent advances in lactic acid production by microbial fermentation processes
Abdel-Rahman, M. A., Tashiro, Y., & Sonomoto, K. (2013) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.04.002 · Cited by 1,022
Lactic acid production – producing microorganisms and substrates sources-state of art
Abedi, E., & Hashemi, S. M. B. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04974 · Cited by 499
Model-driven evaluation of the production potential for growth-coupled products of Escherichia coli
Feist, A. M., Zielinski, D. C., Orth, J. D., Schellenberger, J., Herrgard, M. J., & Palsson, B. Ø. (2010) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2009.10.003 · Cited by 238
125th Anniversary Review: Fuel Alcohol: Current Production and Future Challenges
Walker, G. M. (2011) · Journal of the Institute of Brewing · doi:10.1002/j.2050-0416.2011.tb00438.x · Cited by 97
Rawat, G., Tripathi, P., & Saxena, R. K. (2013) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-013-4840-y · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Dharmadi, Y., Murarka, A., & Gonzalez, R.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-28
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 821-829
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2034175616
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol by Escherichia coli: A new platform for metabolic engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.21025
- The paper
- Dharmadi, Y., Murarka, A., & Gonzalez, R. (2006). Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol by Escherichia coli: A new platform for metabolic engineering. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.