The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The conformational quality of insoluble recombinant proteins is enhanced at low growth temperatures
Abstract
Protein aggregation is a major bottleneck during the bacterial production of recombinant proteins. In general, the induction of gene expression at sub‐optimal growth temperatures improves the solubility of aggregation‐prone polypeptides and minimizes inclusion body (IB) formation. However, the effect of low temperatures on the quality of the recombinant protein, especially within the insoluble cell fraction, has been hardly ever explored. In this work, we have examined the conformational status of a recombinant GFP protein when produced in Escherichia coli below 37°C. As expected, the fraction of aggregated protein largely decreased at lower temperatures, while the conformational quality of both soluble and aggregated GFP, as reflected by its specific fluorescence emission, progressively improved. This observation indicates that physicochemical conditions governing protein folding affect concurrently the quality of the soluble and the aggregated forms of a misfolding‐prone protein, and that protein misfolding and aggregation are clearly not coincident events. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007;96:1101–1106. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soluble expression of recombinant proteins in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli
Sørensen, H. P., & Mortensen, K. K. (2005) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/1475-2859-4-1 · Cited by 841
Cited by
Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges
Rosano, G. L., & Ceccarelli, E. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172 · Cited by 2,556
Protein production and purification
Structural Genomics Consortium, Biologiques, A. E. F. D. M., Berkeley Structural Genomics Center, China Structural Genomics Consortium, Integrated Center for Structure and Function Innovation, Israel Structural Proteomics Center, Joint Center for Structural Genomics, Midwest Center for Structural Genomics, New York Structural GenomiX Research Center for Structural Genomics, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, et al. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.202 · Cited by 916
Taylor, T., Denson, J.-P., & Esposito, D. (2017) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6887-9_5 · Cited by 80
Ojima-Kato, T., Nagai, S., & Nakano, H. (2017) · Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering · doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.12.004 · Cited by 65
Dragosits, M., Frascotti, G., Bernard‐Granger, L., Vázquez, F., Giuliani, M., Baumann, K., Rodríguez‐Carmona, E., Tokkanen, J., Parrilli, E., Wiebe, M. G., et al. (2011) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1002/btpr.524 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vera, A., González‐Montalbán, N., Arís, A., & Villaverde, A.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09-29
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1101-1106
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2010546547
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.