The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of spruce by alkaline pretreatment at low temperature
Abstract
Alkaline pretreatment of spruce at low temperature in both presence and absence of urea was studied. It was found that the enzymatic hydrolysis rate and efficiency can be significantly improved by the pretreatment. At low temperature, the pretreatment chemicals, either NaOH alone or NaOH–urea mixture solution, can slightly remove lignin, hemicelluloses, and cellulose in the lignocellulosic materials, disrupt the connections between hemicelluloses, cellulose, and lignin, and alter the structure of treated biomass to make cellulose more accessible to hydrolysis enzymes. Moreover, the wood fiber bundles could be broken down to small and loose lignocellulosic particles by the chemical treatment. Therefore, the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of untreated mechanical fibers can also be remarkably enhanced by NaOH or NaOH/urea solution treatment. The results indicated that, for spruce, up to 70% glucose yield could be obtained for the cold temperature pretreatment (−15°C) using 7% NaOH/12% urea solution, but only 20% and 24% glucose yields were obtained at temperatures of 23°C and 60°C, respectively, when other conditions remained the same. The best condition for the chemical pretreatment regarding this study was 3% NaOH/12% urea, and −15°C. Over 60% glucose conversion was achieved upon this condition. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008;99: 1320–1328. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
MOSIER, N. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 · Cited by 6,251
Steam Pretreatment of Salix with and without SO2 Impregnation for Production of Bioethanol
Sassner, P., Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2005) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/abab:124:1-3:1101 · Cited by 69
Cited by
Singh, J., Suhag, M., & Dhaka, A. (2015) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.012 · Cited by 462
Zhu, J. Y., Pan, X., & Zalesny, R. S. (2010) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2654-8 · Cited by 350
Self-citationZhao, X., Zhang, L., & Liu, D. (2012) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1350 · Cited by 296
Zhu, J. Y., Wang, G. S., Pan, X. J., & Gleisner, R. (2009) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2008.09.026 · Cited by 263
Self-citationEnhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse by N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide pretreatment
Kuo, C.-H., & Lee, C.-K. (2009) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.07.001 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, J. Y., Ragauskas, A., & Deng, Y.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-19
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1320-1328
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2159805202
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.