Cited by 61Cellular transport and secretionViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsFungal and yeast genetics research

Differential effect of exocytic SNAREs on the production of recombinant proteins in mammalian cells

Peng, Ren‐Wang, Abellan, Eric, Fussenegger, Martin·2011·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

Mammalian cells play a dominant role in the industrial production of biopharmaceutical proteins. However, the productivity of producer cells is often hindered by a bottleneck in the saturated secretory pathway, where a sophisticated mechanism of vesicle trafficking is mediated by numerous proteins and their complexes, among which are the cross‐kingdom conserved SNAREs [soluble NSF (N‐ethylmaleimide‐sensitive factor) receptor]. The SNAREs assemble into complexes by means of four interactive α‐helices and, thus, trigger the fusion of transport vesicles with the respective target membranes. We report that the transgenic expression of exocytic SNAREs, which control the fusion of secretory vesicles to the plasma membrane, differentially impacts the secretory capacity of HEK‐293, HeLa, and CHO‐K1 cells. While other exocytic SNAREs have no effect or a negative effect, SNAP‐23 [synaptosome‐associated protein of 23 kDa] and VAMP8 [vesicle‐associated membrane protein 8] specifically increase the production of recombinant proteins when they are ectopically and stably expressed in mammalian cells. The targeted and effective intervention in the secretory capacity of SNARE proteins is a novel engineering strategy, which could lead to the development of new therapies by increasing the production of biopharmaceutical proteins or by boosting the secretion of cell implants in cell therapy initiatives. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011; 108:611–620. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.22986

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expression of SNAP-23 and VAMP8 has been shown to improve production of SEAP and monoclonal antibodies in CHO-K1 cells.

    “For example, by controlling vesicle docking and fusion, expression of SNAP-23 and VAMP8 has been shown to improve production of SEAP and monoclonal antibodies in CHO-K1 cells (Peng et al., 2011).”

    From Therapeutic glycoprotein production in mammalian cells (2017) · cites this paper as Peng et al., 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, R., Abellan, E., & Fussenegger, M.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Fussenegger, Martin
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-10
Volume
108
Issue
3
Pages
611-620
ISSN
  • 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0290
OpenAlex
W2110371202
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biotechnology and Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
SNAP23, VAMP8, secretory pathway, recombinant protein expression, vesicle fusion, transgene expression, CHO-K1 cells, HEK293 cells, HeLa cells, biopharmaceutical manufacturing, cell therapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Biopharmaceutics, Humans, Mammals, Recombinant Proteins, Cell Culture Techniques, Organisms, Genetically Modified, SNARE Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review