The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Skin tissue generation by laser cell printing
Abstract
For the aim of ex vivo engineering of functional tissue substitutes, Laser‐assisted BioPrinting (LaBP) is under investigation for the arrangement of living cells in predefined patterns. So far three‐dimensional (3D) arrangements of single or two‐dimensional (2D) patterning of different cell types have been presented. It has been shown that cells are not harmed by the printing procedure. We now demonstrate for the first time the 3D arrangement of vital cells by LaBP as multicellular grafts analogous to native archetype and the formation of tissue by these cells. For this purpose, fibroblasts and keratinocytes embedded in collagen were printed in 3D as a simple example for skin tissue. To study cell functions and tissue formation process in 3D, different characteristics, such as cell localisation and proliferation were investigated. We further analysed the formation of adhering and gap junctions, which are fundamental for tissue morphogenesis and cohesion. In this study, it was demonstrated that LaBP is an outstanding tool for the generation of multicellular 3D constructs mimicking tissue functions. These findings are promising for the realisation of 3D in vitro models and tissue substitutes for many applications in tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109:1855–1863. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension
Cukierman, E., Pankov, R., Stevens, D. R., & Yamada, K. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064829 · Cited by 3,027
Tight junctions/adherens junctions: basic structure and function
Niessen, C. M. (2007) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700865 · Cited by 756
Cited by
25th Anniversary Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication
Malda, J., Visser, J., Melchels, F. P., Jüngst, T., Hennink, W. E., Dhert, W. J. A., Groll, J., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302042 · Cited by 1,901
25th Anniversary Article: Rational Design and Applications of Hydrogels in Regenerative Medicine
Annabi, N., Tamayol, A., Uquillas, J. A., Akbari, M., Bertassoni, L. E., Cha, C., Camci‐Unal, G., Dokmeci, M. R., Peppas, N. A., & Khademhosseini, A. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201303233 · Cited by 1,409
Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering
Matai, I., Kaur, G., Seyedsalehi, A., McClinton, A., & Laurencin, C. T. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 · Cited by 1,156
3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering
Zhu, W., Ma, X., Gou, M., Mei, D., Zhang, K., & Chen, S. (2016) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.014 · Cited by 822
Michael, S., Sorg, H., Peck, C.-T., Koch, L., Deiwick, A., Chichkov, B., Vogt, P. M., & Reimers, K. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057741 · Cited by 623
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Koch, L., Deiwick, A., Schlie, S., Michael, S., Gruene, M., Coger, V., Zychlinski, D., Schambach, A., Reimers, K., Vogt, P. M., & Chichkov, B.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-13
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1855-1863
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2112226869
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.